rss
J Clin Pathol doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200647
  • Original article

Significance of acquired diverticular disease of the vermiform appendix: a marker of regional neoplasms?

  1. Susanne Holck1
  1. 1Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
  2. 2Department of Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Professor Susanne Holck, Department of Pathology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, DK-2650, Denmark; susanne.holck{at}hvh.regionh.dk
  1. Contributors KK: Collection of retrospective and prospective material, evaluation of data. SVH: Collection of retrospective material. UE: Collection of prospective material. NHS: Evaluation of data. SH: Evaluation of data, review of material, formulation of the manuscript.

  • Accepted 20 February 2012
  • Published Online First 29 March 2012

Abstract

Aim To assess the prevalence of acquired diverticulum of the appendix (DA), including incipient forms and its possible significance as a marker of local/regional neoplasms.

Materials and Methods The pathology database at Hvidovre Hospital was searched for appendix specimens, received between 2001 and 2010, coded for DA or for a space-occupying lesion. Slides were reviewed to determine DA status and the nature of lesions possibly causing DA.

Result Among 4413 appendix specimens, DA were identified in 39 (0.9%, CI 0.6% to 1.2%) cases, 17 (43.6%, 28.0% to 59.2%) of which additionally harboured an appendiceal neoplasm/neoplastic precursor, whereas this figure was 1.2% (CI 0.9% to 1.6%) for non-DA specimens (p<0.0001). Six of the 39 DA specimens comprised incipient DA, three of which coexisted with appendiceal neoplasms. In addition, local/regional non-neoplastic lesions (six cases) and colorectal carcinomas (four cases) coexisted with DA.

Conclusion DA has significance as a putative marker of local/regional neoplasms. Therefore, a DA specimen proved significantly more likely to harbour a neoplastic growth than a non-DA counterpart. Submission for microscopy of the entire DA specimen, whether transmural or only incipient, and a comment in the pathology report on the occasional concurrence of local/regional neoplasms in this setting seem appropriate. The observation of DA may thus provide a valuable contribution in the diagnostic process.

Footnotes

  • Part of this study has previously been presented at the annual meeting of DSPAC, 2011 (APMIS 2011;119(Suppl 131):15).

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the Scientific Ethical Committee of Region Hovedstaden.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JCP.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.