rss
J Clin Pathol doi:10.1136/jcp.2009.065326

Biotin-Free systems provide stronger Immunohistochemical signal in Estrogen receptor evaluation of breast cancer

  1. Rafael Malagoli Rocha (rafael.malagoli{at}gmail.com)
  1. Hospital do Câncer A C Camargo, Brazil
    1. Keith Miller (rmkdhkm{at}ucl.ac.uk)
    1. U C L, United Kingdom
      1. Fernando A Soares (soaresfernando{at}terra.com.br)
      1. Hospital do Câncer A C Camargo, Brazil
        1. Natalia Schenka (nataliamoraes{at}hotmail.com)
        1. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil
          1. José Vassallo (vassallomeister{at}gmail.com)
          1. Hospital do Câncer A C Camargo, Brazil
            1. Helenice Gobbi (helenicegobbi{at}gmail.com)
            1. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil
              • Published Online First 15 May 2009

              Abstract

              Aims: Biotin-free polymeric visualization systems (BFPS) were compared to streptavidin-biotin systems (SABS) in the evaluation of immunoreactivity for estrogen receptor (ER) in breast carcinomas.

              Methods: The anti-estrogen antibody clone SP1 was employed on a tissue microarray containing 320 breast carcinomas. Eleven different detection systems were used: six BFPS of second generation (Advance, Novolink, SuperPicTure, PicTure Max, Super Sensitive Non-Biotin HRP, and Mouse/Rabbit Polydetector HRP/DAB), one BFPS of first generation (EnVision+), and four SABS (LSAB+, EasyPath, Super Sensitive, and Mouse/Rabbit Immunodetector HRP/DAB). The slides were digitalized using the Mirax scanner and the resulting images were analyzed both by an automated method and by visual analysis using the Allred's score system considering positive nuclear staining. Cytoplasm staining was also separeted evaluated.

              Results: The BFPS Advance and Novolink showed the highest scores by visual analysis, and additionally detected two positive cases which were considered negative using the other detection systems. Likewise, these systems, together with the SAB LSAB+, showed higher staining intensity by the automated method. BFPS revealed no cytoplasm staining, in opposition to the SABS.

              Conclusions: The second generation BFPS, especially Advance and Novolink, provide stronger and sharper nuclear immunohistochemical signal as compared to most SABS, without nonspecific cytoplasm staining. As in few instances these detection systems show discordant results in relation to SABS, further studies correlating these findings to therapeutic response are necessary. BFPS may represent a high quality tool both for research and clinical evalutation of estrogen receptor in breast cancer.

              Latest from JCP Education

              Latest from JCP Education

              Register for free content


              Free sample
              This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JCP.
              View free sample issue >>

              Free archive
              The full back archive is now available for JCP. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
              Register to access the free archive >>

              Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

            1. Latest Pathology jobs

              Latest Pathology jobs