rss
J Clin Pathol doi:10.1136/jcp.2007.049601

Is microscopic examination of hysterectomy specimens removed for clinically benign disease necessary?

  1. Timothy D Andrews (timothy.andrews{at}luht.scot.nhs.uk)
  1. Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    1. Hannah Monaghan (hannah.monaghan{at}luht.scot.nhs.uk)
    1. Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
      • Published Online First 3 August 2007

      Abstract

      The likelihood of finding significant pathology in a hysterectomy specimen undertaken for clinically benign disease is low. Some data indicate that microscopic examination of these specimens may be abandoned. While this approach may seem attractive we believe there are a number of practical and clinical governance issues associated with this. Instead we advocate a pragmatic approach with two tissue blocks (cervix and endomyometrium) being adequate in most cases.

      Latest from JCP Education

      Latest from JCP Education

      Register for free content


      Free sample
      This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JCP.
      View free sample issue >>

      Free archive
      The full back archive is now available for JCP. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
      Register to access the free archive >>

      Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

    1. Latest Pathology jobs

      Latest Pathology jobs