rss
J Clin Pathol doi:10.1136/jcp.2006.043950

Gross synovial fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of joint effusions

  1. Shazia Abdullah (shaziaabdullah{at}doctors.org.uk)
  1. Freeman Hospital, United Kingdom
    1. Steven A YoungMin
    1. Rheumatology, United Kingdom
      1. Sue J Hudson
      1. Pathology Department, United Kingdom
        1. Clive A Kelly
        1. Rheumatology, United Kingdom
          1. Carol R Heycock
          1. Rheumatology, United Kingdom
            1. Jennifer D Hamilton
            1. Rheumatology, United Kingdom
              • Published Online First 26 January 2007

              Abstract

              Aims: To develop an objective and easy to complete standardised questionnaire for documentation of synovial fluid (SF) gross appearance & use it in the assessment of patients presenting to the rheumatology service with a joint effusion according to the published BSR and ACR guidelines.

              Methods: A standardised questionnaire to record the gross appearance of SF was developed. Interobserver error in recorded observations and direct gross analysis of synovial fluid between 4 observers was calculated in a pilot study. In a prospective study over 8 months both SF gross analysis and cell count was documented in all patients presenting with a joint effusion. Fusch Rosenthal manual counting chamber was used for calculating SF cell counts. SPSS data base was used for data collection and statistical tests.

              Results: There was good interobserver agreement on direct gross analysis and between questionnaire assessors (mean Kappa score of 0.889). 80 SF samples were collected. Gross analysis was performed in all samples and cell count in 72. 31%of the specimens thought to be inflammatory on gross analysis were subsequently found to be non inflammatory based on cell count, however 12 of these patients had an established inflammatory arthritis. Gross analysis had a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 58% when used to determine whether SF is inflammatory or non inflammatory. The positive and negative predictive values were 0.69 and 0.91 respectively.

              Conclusions: Documentation of gross SF analysis using a simple tick list was found to have good interobserver agreement. SF cell count did not add any information when SF gross analysis suggested a non inflammatory process. Gross analysis was found to be better than cell count to determine a potentially septic joint fluid. Further work needs to be done on the value of SF cell counts if gross analysis suggests the fluid to be inflammatory.

              Latest from JCP Education

              Latest from JCP Education

              Register for free content


              Free sample
              This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JCP.
              View free sample issue >>

              Free archive
              The full back archive is now available for JCP. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
              Register to access the free archive >>

              Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

            1. Latest Pathology jobs

              Latest Pathology jobs