rss
J Clin Pathol 64:373-379 doi:10.1136/jcp.2010.080820
  • Review

Pitfalls in obtaining and interpreting bone marrow aspirates: to err is human

  1. Katharine Bailey
  1. St Mary's Hospital, Paddington, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Barbara J Bain, Department of Haematology, St Mary's Hospital Campus of Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, UK; b.bain{at}ic.ac.uk
  • Accepted 22 December 2010
  • Published Online First 4 February 2011

Abstract

Pitfalls relating to bone marrow aspirates and their interpretation start even before the aspirate is obtained. There can be failure to perform an aspiration that is clinically indicated or, conversely, an aspiration may be done that is not actually necessary. Once an aspirate is obtained it may be unhelpful because it is a blood tap or very dilute, or because of the sampling error that is intrinsic to the procedure. Even if an adequate aspirate is obtained, it may be misinterpreted. Megaloblastic marrows and children's marrows with increased haematogones or marked reactive changes are particularly prone to misinterpretation. A constant awareness of potential pitfalls and an assessment of the aspirate in the appropriate clinical context will help to reduce errors.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Responses to this article

Latest from JCP Education

Latest from JCP Education

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JCP.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest Pathology jobs

Latest Pathology jobs