rss
J Clin Pathol 2009;62:519-524 doi:10.1136/jcp.2008.062620
  • Original article

Is histological diagnosis of primary liver carcinomas with fibrous stroma reproducible among experts?

  1. G Malouf1,
  2. B Falissard2,
  3. D Azoulay2,
  4. F Callea3,
  5. L D Ferrell4,
  6. Z D Goodman5,
  7. Y Hayashi6,
  8. H-C Hsu7,
  9. S G Hubscher8,
  10. M Kojiro9,
  11. I O Ng10,
  12. A C Paterson11,
  13. M Reynes2,
  14. E-S Zafrani12,
  15. J-F Emile1
  1. 1
    EA4340, Versailles SQY University and Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, Boulogne, France
  2. 2
    Paul Brousse Hospital, APHP, Villejuif, France
  3. 3
    Bambino Gesù Hospital, Rome, Italy
  4. 4
    University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
  5. 5
    Armed Force Institute of Pathology, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
  6. 6
    Faculty of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  7. 7
    National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  8. 8
    University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  9. 9
    Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
  10. 10
    University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  11. 11
    University of Witwatersrand, Parktown, South Africa
  12. 12
    Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, Créteil, France
  1. Jean-François Emile, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Pathology Department, 9 Av. Ch. De Gaulle, F-92104 Boulogne, France; jean-francois.emile{at}apr.aphp.fr
  • Accepted 29 December 2008

Abstract

Aims: In the era of targeted therapeutics, histological typing of hepatobiliary carcinomas has major clinical implications. Little is known about the reproducibility of the pathological diagnosis of primary liver carcinomas. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the worldwide variation in the pathological expert diagnoses of primary liver carcinomas with fibrous stroma in patients who did not have cirrhosis.

Methods: A single set of slides was selected from 25 tumours, and this set was reviewed independently by 12 pathologists who have worldwide expertise in liver tumours. Reproducibility of the diagnoses was evaluated by Light’s κ, and diagnoses were clustered by multidimensional scaling. Immunohistochemistry was performed after histological review.

Results: The interobserver reproducibility for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma subtypes and cholangiocarcinomas was poor (κ 0.23–0.52), even when the experts considered that the diagnosis required no additional stains or clinical information. Interestingly, multidimensional scaling revealed three main clusters of tumours: hepatocellular carcinoma with no other specifications (n = 13), fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 3) and cholangiocarcinoma (n = 9). Using immunohistochemistry, these histological clusters correlated with expression of anti-hepatocyte and anti-cytokeratin 19 (p<0.001).

Conclusions: The results demonstrate the poor reproducibility among experts of the pathological diagnosis of primary liver carcinomas with fibrous stroma in patients who did not have cirrhosis, and highlight that the systematic use of immunohistochemistry may improve the diagnostic accuracy.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Funding: This work was supported by grants from AREP (Association pour la Recherche et l’Enseignement en Pathologie).

Latest from JCP Education

Latest from JCP Education

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JCP.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for JCP. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

  • Latest Pathology jobs

    Latest Pathology jobs