rss
J Clin Pathol 2009;62:939-941 doi:10.1136/jcp.2009.064444
  • Original article

Diagnosis of conjunctivitis in primary care: comparison of two different culture procedures

  1. E Tellegen1,
  2. G ter Riet1,2,
  3. J H Sloos3,
  4. H C P M van Weert1
  1. 1
    Academic Medical Center, Department of General Practice, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2
    Horten Centre, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  3. 3
    Medical Center Alkmaar, Laboratory for Medical Microbiology, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr E Tellegen, Academic Medical Center, Department of General Practice, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands; e.tellegen{at}wanadoo.nl
  • Accepted 2 July 2009
  • Published Online First 20 August 2009

Abstract

Background: In general practice, infectious conjunctivitis is a common and mostly (64%) self-limiting disorder. In case of an aberrant course or severe symptoms, a general practitioner may take a culture. Direct inoculation is considered the reference standard, but usually a swab is sent to a laboratory.

Objectives: To compare the diagnostic performance of the swab, transported by surface mail with direct inoculation.

Methods: 19 general practitioners took two samples of the conjunctiva from 88 patients with symptoms suggestive of infectious conjunctivitis by rolling a cotton swab across the conjunctiva of the lower fornix. One swab was used to inoculate three agar plates directly, while the other was sent in a Stuart medium to the laboratory and inoculated at the time of arrival. The numbers of positive cultures of both methods were compared.

Results: A pathogen was found in 31 of 88 samples (35% (95% CI 26 to 46)). Surprisingly, the number of positive cultures was higher for the Stuart medium (27/88) than for direct inoculation (23/88). The difference was 4.5% (90% CI 0 to 12, p = 0.388; one-sided McNemar test for paired proportions). In five of the 19 samples that were positive in both tests, the cultured pathogens were different.

Conclusions: The Stuart medium detected more bacteria than direct inoculation. The lower 90% CI, testing non-inferiority at p = 0.05, indicates that it is unlikely that the Stuart medium misses any positive cultures compared with direct inoculation.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review not commissioned; externally peer reviewed

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. All versions of this article:
    1. jcp.2009.064444v1
    2. 62/10/939 most recent

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.