rss
J Clin Pathol 2008;61:482-486 doi:10.1136/jcp.2007.047621
  • Original article

Colorectal carcinoma with dome-like phenotype: an under-recognised subset of colorectal carcinoma?

  1. L Asmussen1,2,
  2. J Pachler1,2,
  3. S Holck1,2
  1. 1
    Department of Pathology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
  2. 2
    Dept of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
  1. Dr Susanne Holck, Dept of Pathology, 134, Hvidovre University Hospital, Kettegaard Allé 30, DK-2650 Hvidovr, Denmark; Susanne.holck{at}hvh.regionh.dk
  • Accepted 21 August 2007
  • Published Online First 7 September 2007

Abstract

Background: The term dome carcinoma has been applied to a variant of colorectal carcinoma, thought to derive from M-cells of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue. Its distinguishing morphological features include a non-polypoid plaque-like lesion composed of closely apposed cystically dilated glands lined by a single layer of non-mucinous cells, intensely PAS-positive intraluminal material, and a close spatial relation to lymphoid stroma.

Aims and Methods: A search in the literature for such cases and the authors’ experience with carcinomas sharing morphological details with dome carcinoma are presented to direct focus on this unique phenotype of colorectal carcinoma and to expand on its morphology.

Results: Four such examples, all stage pT1, pN0 have been previously reported. Here two additional cases, with several features of dome carcinoma, stage pT1 and pT2, respectively, are added. An extensive intramucosal component, unassociated with adenomatous growth, a pink quality of the lesional cells, low grade budding, absence of cytoplasmic pseudofragments, and absence of necrosis characterised the present cases as well as intact MMR-proteins and loss of APC. As opposed to two of the previously reported cases, intraepithelial lymphocytes were unapparent in these cases and the lymphoid stroma was effaced along with tumour progression in one of the present cases. Hence, a range of appearances is encompassed by the dome carcinoma. The uncommon reporting of dome carcinoma may be due to lack of awareness of this particular subset of colorectal carcinoma. Indeed, one of the current cases was signed out as a conventional carcinoma, despite the comment in the pathology report of an unusual morphology.

Conclusion: Dome carcinoma may be more under-recognised than rare. The reporting of variants of colorectal carcinoma, displaying histological features suggestive of dome carcinoma, is encouraged in order to obtain more exact knowledge on its putative clinical significance.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

Latest from JCP Education

Latest from JCP Education

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JCP.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for JCP. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

  • Latest Pathology jobs

    Latest Pathology jobs