rss
J Clin Pathol 2008;61:322-326 doi:10.1136/jcp.2007.053173
  • Original article

Ownership and uses of human tissue: what are the opinions of surgical in-patients?

  1. R J Bryant1,
  2. R F Harrison4,
  3. R D Start5,
  4. A S A Chetwood2,
  5. A M Chesshire2,
  6. M W R Reed2,
  7. S S Cross3
  1. 1
    Academic Unit of Urology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Sheffield, UK
  2. 2
    Academic Unit of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Sheffield, UK
  3. 3
    Academic Unit of Pathology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Sheffield, UK
  4. 4
    Department of Automatic Control & Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, UK
  5. 5
    Department of Histopathology, Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Calow, UK
  1. Dr Simon Cross, Reader in Pathology, Academic Unit of Pathology, School of Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK; s.s.cross{at}sheffield.ac.uk
  • Accepted 15 November 2007
  • Published Online First 6 February 2008

Abstract

Aims: To investigate whether patient opinion about the uses of tissue removed at therapeutic operations has changed since the adverse publicity surrounding the Alder Hey and Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiries, and to see whether it aligns with the Human Tissue Act 2004.

Methods: A questionnaire was given to 220 postoperative patients in a teaching hospital during an 11 week period. Aggregated responses to each question were ranked in frequency order. Unweighted centroid linkage hierarchical clustering analysis was performed with dendrogram display for the main data on tissue usage.

Results: 203 completed questionnaires were collected (compliance rate 92.3%). 96.3% of patients indicated that they would not object to their tissue being used in research, significantly higher than in the 1996 study (89.1%) with no overlap of the 95% CIs. 29.1% of patients believed that the hospital had ownership of tissue once it has been removed during surgery, 23.2% believed they had ownership, 19.7% believed that the pathology laboratory had ownership, and 15.3% believed that nobody had ownership rights in the case of tissue samples.

Conclusions: This new survey indicates that despite a turbulent decade for those involved in human tissue retention in the UK, public support for a wide range of human tissue based activities, especially biomedical research, has not diminished and that patient opinion aligns well with the Human Tissue Act 2004.

Footnotes

  • Funding: No funding was received for this study. The minimal costs of questionnaire production were met from non-specific departmental budgets.

  • Competing interests:None declared.

  • Ethics approval: This study was approved by the South Sheffield Research Ethics Committee 04/Q2305/190.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. All versions of this article:
    1. jcp.2007.053173v1
    2. 61/3/322 most recent

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.