rss
J Clin Pathol 2007;60:685-689 doi:10.1136/jcp.2006.044321
  • Original article

HER2 testing in the UK: consensus from a national consultation

  1. Mitch Dowsett1,
  2. A M Hanby2,
  3. R Laing3,
  4. R Walker4,
  5. for the National HER2 Consultation Steering Group
  1. 1The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK
  2. 2Department of Pathology, Nottingham City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
  3. 3The Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Trust, Egerton Road, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XX, UK
  4. 4Breast Cancer Research Unit, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor Dowsett
 Academic Department of Biochemistry, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK; mitch.dowsett{at}icr.ac.uk
  • Accepted 25 January 2007
  • Published Online First 23 February 2007

Abstract

Objective: To gain an understanding of current attitudes among oncologists and pathologists to prospective HER2 testing in breast cancer and to gauge whether a national consensus exists regarding extent and quality of testing.

Design: Qualitative study, with semi-quantitative components, using emailed questionnaires and open-ended discussion documents.

Participants: 186 relevant specialists, including 76 breast oncologists and 99 pathologists, representing all but three of the UK cancer networks.

Results: A strong consensus was seen in favour of universal, non-selective testing for HER2 at the point of breast cancer diagnosis. Similarly, an overwhelming majority of participants agreed that, to optimise the quality of test results, all laboratories undertaking HER2 testing should be CPA-accredited, participate in the recognised national external quality assessment scheme (UK NEQAS), and carry out a formal annual audit of its testing service. A further recommendation that testing be restricted to laboratories undertaking a minimum 250 tests per annum for immunohistochemistry and 100 tests per annum for in situ hybridisation techniques met with majority support. However, this was not a clear consensus; a significant minority of participants favoured continued use of local services falling short of these criteria.

Conclusion: This study was successful in gauging national specialist opinion regarding the extent and quality assurance of HER2 testing in the UK.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 23 February 2007

  • Funding: The research programme described was funded unconditionally by Roche Products Ltd. The authors acted entirely independently from the funding organisation, which sought no control whatever over the design or content of the research.

  • Competing interests: None of the authors has any competing financial interests. All authors have received fees for consultation, speaking at symposia and cover for travel from various companies, including Roche Products Ltd. MD has received research funding from various pharmaceutical companies, including Roche Products Ltd

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. All versions of this article:
    1. jcp.2006.044321v1
    2. 60/6/685 most recent

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.