rss
J Clin Pathol 2007;60:593-595 doi:10.1136/jcp.2006.040873
  • Original article

Histological processing variability in the determination of lateral resection margins in rectal cancer

  1. I Eid1,
  2. M S El-Muhtaseb1,
  3. R Mukherjee1,
  4. R Renwick1,
  5. D S Gardiner2,
  6. A Macdonald1
  1. 1Department of Surgery, Monklands Hospital, Airdrie, UK
  2. 2Department of Pathology, Monklands Hospital, Airdrie, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr A Macdonald
 Department of Surgery, Monklands Hospital, Monkscourt Avenue, Airdrie ML6 OJS, UK; angus.macdonald{at}lanarkshire.scot.nhs.uk
  • Accepted 9 June 2006
  • Published Online First 5 July 2006

Abstract

Background: Involvement of the lateral resection margin (LRM) has been shown to be a reliable predictor of local recurrence of rectal cancer. Accurate determination of the LRM status is crucial in selecting patients for postoperative radiotherapy. However, variability in processing factors may affect the measurement of the LRM.

Aim: To investigate how formalin fixation and laboratory processing affects the measurement of the LRM.

Methods: For this study, rectal cancer specimens (n = 9) were fixed in formalin for 4 days and then sectioned transversally, and one half of the specimen was sent for processing. The effacing tumours were placed back in formalin for another 3 days. At day 7, the effacing tumour block (mirror image) was sent for processing. The longest and the shortest perpendicular resection margins for each of the day 4 and day 7 specimens were measured. In a second experiment, control tissue (colon; n = 40), length 10 (0.05) mm, was also processed from a normal sigmoid colon.

Specimens were retained in formalin for 24 h (n = 12), 48 h (n = 12), 72 h (n = 9) and 96 h (n = 7). The degree of tissue shrinkage was then recorded. Variations in the recorded LRM and length of colonic tissue are presented as a median (interquartile range) and data were compared using analysis of variance.

Results: In the cases of rectal cancer, the variation in measured LRM between day 4 and day 7 specimens was 3.2 (1.5–5) mm. In 30 of the 37 comparisons, the day 7 LRM increased in length, whereas in the remaining 7 it decreased. In the second experiment, control tissue of the original length 10 (0.05) mm increased in length to 10.9 (8.9–13.0) mm, p<0.01.

Conclusion: These results suggest that the fixation period/laboratory processes result in measurable differences in the reported LRM. This degree of variation has implications for the reliable reporting of the LRM, predicting local recurrence rates and planning subsequent adjuvant radiotherapy.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 5 July 2006

  • Competing interests: None declared.

Responses to this article

Latest from JCP Education

Latest from JCP Education

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JCP.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for JCP. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

  • Latest Pathology jobs

    Latest Pathology jobs