rss

This article has a correction

Please see: J Clin Pathol 2006;59:1116

J Clin Pathol 2006;59:781-789 doi:10.1136/jcp.200X.033944
  • Review

Best practice in primary care pathology: review 3

  1. W S A Smellie1,
  2. J Forth2,
  3. D Bareford3,
  4. P Twomey4,
  5. M J Galloway5,
  6. E C M Logan6,
  7. S R S Smart7,
  8. T M Reynolds8,
  9. C Waine9
  1. 1Department of Chemical Pathology, Bishop Auckland General Hospital, Bishop Auckland, County Durham, UK
  2. 2Sowerby Centre for Health Informatics, Bede House, All Saints Business Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  3. 3Department of Haematology, City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
  4. 4Department of Chemical Pathology, Ipswich Hospital, Heath Road, Ipswich, UK
  5. 5Department of Haematology, E Floor Haematology Office, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UK
  6. 6Department of Haematology, Kings Mill Centre, Sutton in Ashfield, Nottingham, UK
  7. 7PRODIGY, Sowerby Centre for Health Informatics at Newcastle, Bede House, All Saints Business Centre
  8. 8Department of Clinical Chemistry, Queens Hospital, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, UK
  9. 9Department of Primary Care, University of Sunderland, St Georges Way, Sunderland
  1. Correspondence to:
 W S A Smellie
 Department of Chemical Pathology, Bishop Auckland General Hospital, Cockton Hill Road, Bishop Auckland, County Durham DL14 6AD, UK; info{at}smellie.com
  • Accepted 3 November 2005

Abstract

This best practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (i) “minor” blood platelet count and haemoglobin abnormalities; (ii) diagnosis and monitoring of anaemia caused by iron deficiency; (iii) secondary hyperlipidaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia; and (iv) glycated haemoglobin and microalbumin use in diabetes. The review is presented in question–answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by Medline Embase searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards, but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most of the recommendations are based on consensus rather than evidence. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

Responses to this article

Register for free content


Free trial
Individuals may register for a free 60 day online trial to all content.

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they ar