rss
J Clin Pathol 2006;59:113-120 doi:10.1136/jcp.2005.031526
  • Review

Best practice in primary care pathology: review 2

  1. W S Smellie1,
  2. J O Forth2,
  3. C A M McNulty3,
  4. L Hirschowitz4,
  5. D Lilic5,
  6. R Gosling6,
  7. D Bareford7,
  8. E Logan8,
  9. K G Kerr9,
  10. G P Spickett10,
  11. J Hoffman1,
  12. A Galloway11,
  13. C A Bloxham1
  1. 1Bishop Auckland General Hospital, Cockton Hill Road, Bishop Auckland, County Durham DL14 6AD, UK
  2. 2Prodigy, Sowerby Centre for Health Informatics, Bede House, All Saints Business Céntre, Newcastle Upon Tyre NEI 2ES, UK
  3. 3Health Protection Agency Primary, Care Unit, Microbiology Department, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK
  4. 4Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
  5. 5University Hospital of North Durham, North Road, Durham DH1 5TW, UK
  6. 6Darlington Memorial Hospital, Hollyhurst Road, Darlington, County Durham DL3 6HX, UK
  7. 7Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands DY1 2HQ, UK
  8. 8Department of Haematology, Kings Mill Centre, Mansfield Road, Sutton in Ashfield, Nottingham NG17 4JL, UK
  9. 9Department of Microbiology, Harrogate District Hospital, Lancaster Park Road, Harrogate, North Yorkshire HG2 7SX, UK
  10. 10Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK
  11. 11Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr W S A Smellie
 Department of Chemical Pathology, Bishop Auckland General Hospital, Cockton Hill Road, Bishop Auckland, County Durham DL14 6AD, UK; info{at}smellie.com
  • Accepted 2 August 2005

Abstract

This second best practice review examines five series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (1) laboratory testing for allergy, (2) diagnosis and monitoring of menopause, (3) the use of urine cytology, (4) the usefulness of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and (5) the investigation of possible urinary tract infection. The review is presented in a question–answer format. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents, and evidence based medicine reviews, supplemented by MEDLINE EMBASE searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.

Footnotes

    Responses to this article

    • The value of total IgE levels in the context of specific allergy
      • Desa Lilic,
      • W. Stuart Smellie, and Gavin P. Spickett
      J Clin Pathol published online April 25, 2006
    • The value of total IgE levels in the context of specific allergy
      • Sujoy Khan,
      • S Holding, PC Doré, WAC Sewell
      J Clin Pathol published online March 2, 2006

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Register for free content


    Free trial
    Individuals may register for a free 60 day online trial to all content.

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they ar