rss
J Clin Pathol 2004;57:835-839 doi:10.1136/jcp.2003.013607
  • Original article

Intraepithelial lymphocytes in the villous tip: do they indicate potential coeliac disease?

  1. F Biagi1,
  2. O Luinetti2,
  3. J Campanella1,
  4. C Klersy3,
  5. C Zambelli4,
  6. V Villanacci4,
  7. A Lanzini5,
  8. G R Corazza1
  1. 1Gastroenterology Unit, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
  2. 2Pathology Department, University of Pavia
  3. 3Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia
  4. 4Second Pathology Department, Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, 25100 Brescia, Italy
  5. 5Internal Medicine Department, Spedali Civili, University of Brescia
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr F Biagi
 Gastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, P.le Golgi, 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy; f.biagismatteo.pv.it
  • Accepted 14 November 2003

Abstract

Background: The counting of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) in the villous tips of architecturally normal small bowel biopsy specimens was proposed as a method to measure mucosal infiltration in gluten sensitive patients.

Aims: To apply this straightforward method in duodenal biopsy specimens from patients affected by potential coeliac disease (PCD) to verify whether it can discriminate these patients from controls.

Methods: Paraffin wax embedded duodenal sections from 11 patients affected by PCD were stained with an antihuman CD3 antibody. Sections from 19 patients affected by treated coeliac disease (TCD) and 17 patients in whom coeliac disease was excluded were stained with the same antibody to serve as controls. The slides were examined blindly. IELs/20 enterocytes in five randomly chosen villous tips were counted. Patients affected by PCD were all on a gluten containing diet. They had an architecturally normal duodenal mucosa and were positive for endomysial antibody. Both TCD and non-coeliac controls were negative for endomysial antibody.

Results: The mean villous tip IEL scores were 4.6 (SD, 1.5; range, 1.4–7.8) in non-coeliac controls, 7.9 (SD, 4.0; range, 2.0–18.6) in TCD, and 9.2 (SD, 4.7; range, 5.8–21.8) in patients with PCD. The difference between PCD and non-coeliac controls was significant.

Conclusions: This is a very simple and sufficiently reliable method to count IELs. In patients with an architecturally normal duodenal mucosa, the IEL count in villous tips helps to distinguish between patients with PCD and non-coeliac controls.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.