rss
J Clin Pathol 57:687-690 doi:10.1136/jcp.2003.014894
  • Original article

Technical variations in prostatic immunohistochemistry: need for standardisation and stringent quality assurance in PSA and PSAP immunostaining

Table 2

 Choice of tissue for quality control of PSA and PSAP immunohistochemistry

Tissue Optimisation of antibody dilutions External positive control
UK laboratories
 N (%) Non-UK laboratories
 N (%) UK laboratories
 N (%) Non-UK laboratories
 N (%)
PC, prostate cancer; PSA, prostate specific antigen; PSAP, prostate specific acid phosphatase.
Not indicated 11 (8%) 7 (8%) 5 (4%) 6 (7%)
None 0 2 (2%) 11 (8%) 6 (7%)
Benign prostate 84 (63%) 65 (75%) 82 (62%) 67 (77%)
Benign prostate + well differentiated PC 14 (11%) 4 (5%) 10 (8%) 2 (2%)
Well differentiated PC 15 (11%) 5 (6%) 20 (15%) 5 (6%)
Benign prostate + poorly differentiated PC 2 (2%) 1 (1%) 2 (2%) 0
Well differentiated PC + poorly differentiated PC 1 (1%) 0 1 (1%) 0
Poorly differentiated PC 2 (2%) 0 1 (1%) 0
Benign prostate + well differentiated PC + poorly differentiated PC 4 (3%) 3 (3%) 1 (1%) 1 (1%)

This Article

Latest from JCP Education

Latest from JCP Education

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JCP.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest Pathology jobs

Latest Pathology jobs