rss
J Clin Pathol 2003;56:654-659 doi:10.1136/jcp.56.9.654
  • Original article

Measures of benefit for breast screening from the pathology database for Scotland, 1991–2001

  1. T J Anderson1,
  2. C Davis3,
  3. F E Alexander2,
  4. H M Dobson4,
  5. On Behalf Of The Scottish Breast Pathology Coordination Group
  1. 1Department of Pathology, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
  2. 2Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh
  3. 3Common Services Agency, Trinity Park House, Edinburgh EH5 3SQ, UK
  4. 4Breast Screening Clinic, Nelson Mendela Square, Glasgow G2 1QT, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor T J Anderson, Department of Pathology, Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK;
 t.j.anderson{at}ed.ac.uk
  • Accepted 25 April 2003

Abstract

Aims: To examine pathology characteristics of breast cancers detected by mammography screening over 10 years in Scotland, and compare the nature of cancer yields after different levels of very small invasive cancer at prevalence detection.

Methods: A pathology database of cancers from mammography screening of women aged 50–64 years invited every three years was used to assess the variation over time in annual yield of different invasive cancer sizes. Screening centres were compared for incidence screen yields, according to sizes, histological type, grade, and node status.

Results: There was a significant trend over time for increased detection of < 15 mm cancers among 2353 prevalence cancers, and a significant trend for increase in all size groups, < 10, 10–14, < 15, and ≥ 15 mm, among 2245 incidence cancers. Based on individual screening centres, there was a significant negative relation between proportions of very small (< 10 mm) cancers at prevalence screens and of large (≥ 15 mm) cancers at incidence screens of the same “cohort” three years later. There was no significant relation on the same centre basis for worse pathology characteristics (histological no special type, high grade, and positive node status) in cancers detected in the same “cohort” three years later.

Conclusions: Sensitive mammography screening has a significant effect on the nature of yields at subsequent screens. Length of screening interval and consistency in pathologist opinions are factors that account for lack of effect on incidence cancer qualitative pathology characteristics. These issues are relevant to the use of such characteristics as surrogate measures of service screening performance.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content


    Free trial
    Individuals may register for a free 60 day online trial to all content.

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they ar