rss
J Clin Pathol 56:447-452 doi:10.1136/jcp.56.6.447
  • Original article

Proliferation markers and DNA content analysis in urinary bladder TaT1 urothelial cell carcinomas: identification of subgroups with low and high stage progression risks

Table 2

Correlation (Spearman’s test) between the biomarkers and DNA analysis results

MNA10 Ki67 MAI p53 DI FCM SPF FCM DI ICM SPF ICM
Note the strong correlation (R>0.65, bold) for the in situ biomarkers with each other, but not with the DNA cytometric features (either by ICM or FCM).
DI, DNA index; FCM, flow cytometry; ICM, image cytometry; MAI, mitotic activity index; MNA10, mean area of the 10 largest nuclei; P, probability of no significance (<0.05); R, correlation coefficient; SPF, S phase fraction.
MNA10 R 1.00 0.74 0.67 0.71 0.62 0.40 0.60 0.56
P 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Ki67 R 1.00 0.82 0.69 0.53 0.45 0.55 0.56
P 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
MAI R 1.00 0.62 0.53 0.40 0.55 0.51
P 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
p53 R 1.00 0.46 0.33 0.44 0.47
P 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
DI FCM R 1.00 0.57 0.79 0.41
P 0.000 0.000 0.000
SPF FCM R 1.00 0.45 0.37
P 0.000 0.000
DI ICM R 1.00 0.50
P 0.000
SPF ICM R 1.00
P

This Article

Latest from JCP Education

Latest from JCP Education

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JCP.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest Pathology jobs

Latest Pathology jobs