rss
J Clin Pathol 2003;56:336-340 doi:10.1136/jcp.56.5.336
  • Review

Guidelines for processing and reporting of prostatic needle biopsies

  1. Th H van der Kwast1,
  2. C Lopes2,
  3. C Santonja3,
  4. C-G Pihl4,
  5. I Neetens5,
  6. P Martikainen6,
  7. S Di Lollo7,
  8. L Bubendorf8,
  9. R F Hoedemaeker1,
  10. members of The Pathology Committee Of The European Randomised Study Of Screening For Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)
  1. 1Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Anatomy-Pathology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Francisco Gentil, 4200 Porto, Portugal
  3. 3Department of Anatomy-Pathology, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, 28905 Getafe (Madrid), Spain
  4. 4Department of Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Östra, S-41685 Göteborg, Sweden
  5. 5Department of Pathology, Academic Hospital Middelheim, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium
  6. 6Department of Pathology, Centre for Laboratory Medicine, FIN-33521 Tampere, Finland
  7. 7Department of Pathology, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
  8. 8Institue of Pathology, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor Th H van der Kwast, Department of Pathology, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
 vanderkwast{at}path.fgg.eur.nl
  • Accepted 25 October 2002

Abstract

The reported detection rate of prostate cancer, lesions suspicious for cancer, and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) in needle biopsies is highly variable. In part, technical factors, including the quality of the biopsies, the tissue processing, and histopathological reporting, may account for these differences. It has been thought that standardisation of tissue processing might reduce the observed variations in detection rate. Consensus among the members of the pathology committee of the European Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) concerning the optimal methodology of tissue embedding resulting in guidelines for prostatic needle biopsy processing was reached. The adoption of an unequivocal and uniform way of reporting lesions encountered in prostatic needle biopsies is considered helpful for decision taking by the clinician. The definition of parameters for quality control of prostatic needle biopsy diagnostics will further facilitate clinical epidemiological multicentre studies of prostate cancer.

Footnotes

    Latest from JCP Education

    Latest from JCP Education

    Register for free content


    Free sample
    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JCP.
    View free sample issue >>

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for JCP. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
    Register to access the free archive >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

  • Latest Pathology jobs

    Latest Pathology jobs