rss
J Clin Pathol 2003;56:300-304 doi:10.1136/jcp.56.4.300
  • Original article

Type 1 growth factor receptor expression in node positive breast cancer: adverse prognostic significance of c-erbB-4

  1. A J Lodge1,
  2. J J Anderson1,
  3. W J Gullick2,
  4. B Haugk1,
  5. R C F Leonard3,
  6. B Angus1
  1. 1Department of Pathology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
  2. 2Department of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, UK
  3. 3South West Wales Cancer Institute, Singleton Hospital, Swansea SA2 8QA, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr B Angus, Department of Pathology, University of Newcastle, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK; 
 brian.angus{at}ncl.ac.uk
  • Accepted 3 October 2002

Abstract

Background: There is a clear need to define biological markers that will predict the response to treatment in breast cancer, and several recent studies suggest that the expression of type 1 growth factor receptors may prove important in this regard. The type 1 growth factor receptors are a family of transmembrane receptors comprising epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), c-erbB-2, c-erbB-3, and c-erbB-4. Both EGFR and c-erbB-2 are associated with poor prognosis in certain tumours.

Aims: There is very little information concerning expression patterns of the full range of type 1 growth factor receptors, especially with respect to c-erbB-3 and c-erbB-4. Therefore, this study was designed to compare the expression of each, and to assess whether expression of any of the factors was related to patient survival in a clinical series.

Methods: Type 1 growth factor receptor expression was investigated by means of immunohistochemistry in a series of node positive patients with breast cancer (n = 66), and statistical analysis was carried out to determine associations between variables and survival analysis for each variable.

Results: There were several correlations between variables, and overexpression of EGFR, c-erbB-2, and c-erbB-4 was found to be associated with adverse clinical outcome, although the results were significant only for c-erbB-4 (p = 0.002).

Conclusion: Although patient numbers are small, this is the first report describing c-erbB-4 as an adverse prognostic marker. These findings are in contrast to previous investigations and may relate to the fact that the patients studied all had advanced stage disease and had undergone similar chemotherapy regimens in the context of a clinical trial.

Footnotes

  • R C F Leonard represents the Anglo Celtic Co-operative Oncology Group

This Article

Services

  1. Request permissions

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Latest from JCP Education

Latest from JCP Education

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JCP.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for JCP. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

  • Latest Pathology jobs

    Latest Pathology jobs