rss
J Clin Pathol 2002;55:719 doi:10.1136/jcp.55.9.719-a
  • Correspondence

The use of a standard proforma in breast cancer reporting

  1. E Wilson1,
  2. R Feakins2
  1. 1Department of Histopathology, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK; wilsoneliz63{at}hotmail.com
  2. 2Department of Histopathology, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1BB, UK

      According to a recent paper in this journal by Mathers et al,1 the use of a standard proforma for breast cancer resulted in 74% completeness of reporting. However, there is no mention in that paper, or in other reports of audits of compliance with standard data sets,2–5 of clinicians requesting missing data, or of the issue of supplementary reports.

      At the Royal London Hospital, we recently audited colorectal cancer resection histopathology reports for compliance with the Royal College of Pathologists' Minimum Data set (MDS). At the ensuing audit meeting, various reasons for non-compliance with the MDS were discussed. It was obvious that not all data items in the MDS were appropriate for every case and that it might be unrealistic to strive for full compliance with the MDS. Indeed, clinicians may have ignored omissions not relevant to patient management. Relevant missing data may have been provided verbally at multidisciplinary team meetings, but few written supplementary reports were issued.

      If an MDS truly is minimum, then published reports of audits and our audit have shown that large proportions of patients have their management planned without essential pathological data. Full compliance can probably only be achieved by rigid adherence to the MDS, and by issuing supplementary reports if data items are missing. Unfortunately, full compliance is probably necessary, even when data items are of no clinical relevance, so that accusations of failure to comply with a “minimum” standard are avoided.

      To cover every angle, perhaps histopathology cancer audits should record not only compliance with the MDS, but also whether the report was optimal for planning patient management, whether the multidisciplinary team meeting requested further information, and whether supplementary reports were issued.

      References

      This Article

      Services

      1. Request permissions

      Responses

      1. Submit a response
      2. No responses published

      Social bookmarking

      Latest from JCP Education

      Latest from JCP Education

      Register for free content


      Free sample
      This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JCP.
      View free sample issue >>

      Free archive
      The full back archive is now available for JCP. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
      Register to access the free archive >>

      Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

    • Latest Pathology jobs

      Latest Pathology jobs