JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 February 2008

J Clin Pathol. Published Online First: 17 August 2007. doi:10.1136/jcp.2007.049478
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jcp.2007.049478v1
61/2/152    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCluggage, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCluggage, G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Ovarian Cancer

Histopathology

My Thoughts on and approach to the typing of Ovarian carcinomas

Glenn McCluggage 1*

1 Royal Belfast Hospital, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: glenn.mccluggage{at}bll.n-i.nhs.uk.

Accepted 26 July 2007


*   Abstract

Ovarian carcinomas of epithelial type comprise a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, each with a different underlying pathogenesis and natural behaviour. Accurate classification of ovarian carcinomas is important since each type may be associated with a different behaviour, natural history and outcome. Precise classification is also critical to determine whether alternative therapeutic strategies are appropriate for different tumour types. Previous studies have shown significant interobserver variation in the typing of ovarian carcinomas. There are several areas where there are particular difficulties; these include the distinction between high grade serous and endometrioid adenocarcinomas and the distinction between a true clear cell carcinoma and clear cell areas within other adenocarcinomas. This review details my approach to the typing of ovarian carcinomas. Morphological assessment, which remains the mainstay in diagnosis, can be supplemented by immunohistochemistry which, for example, is useful in the distinction between serous carcinomas (WT1 positive) and other carcinomas (generally WT1 negative). In recent years, there is emerging new information regarding the major underlying molecular events in several types of ovarian carcinoma. This has resulted in the acceptance that there are two distinct types of ovarian serous carcinoma. These are termed low grade and high grade serous carcinoma but represent two distinct tumour types rather than low grade and high grade variants of the same neoplasm. The integration of clinical, morphological and molecular data has resulted in a more precise classification of ovarian carcinomas and has resulted in the proposal for a broad dualistic pathway of ovarian epithelial carcinogenesis with, in general, low grade type 1 tumours evolving from benign and borderline neoplasms through a well-defined adenoma-carcinoma sequence, and high grade type 2 neoplasms arising from an, as yet, undefined precursor lesion.

Key Words: ADENOCARCINOMA, IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY, MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, OVARY, TYPING




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
K Miller, J H Price, S P Dobbs, R H McClelland, K Kennedy, and W G McCluggage
An immunohistochemical and morphological analysis of post-chemotherapy ovarian carcinoma
J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2008; 61(5): 652 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.