JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 October 2007

J Clin Pathol. Published Online First: 9 February 2007. doi:10.1136/jcp.2006.044727
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jcp.2006.044727v1
60/10/1155    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crowley, R. K
Right arrow Articles by Smyth, E. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crowley, R. K
Right arrow Articles by Smyth, E. G
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Antibiotics
Hazardous Substances DB
*VANCOMYCIN

Microbiology

Vancomycin administration: the impact of multidisciplinary interventions

Rachel K Crowley 1*, Fidelma M Fitzpatrick 2, Damodar Solanki 1, Susan Fitzgerald 1, Hilary Humphreys 3 and Edmond G Smyth 1

1 Beaumont Hospital, Republic of Ireland
2 Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
3 Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Republic of Ireland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rachelcrowley{at}beaumont.ie.

Accepted 4 January 2007


*   Abstract

Background: The clinical microbiology team observed that patients were not receiving all prescribed doses of vancomycin. Ward staff was confused about ordering and interpreting vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) levels.

Aim: To audit the incidence of vancomycin dose omission. To implement a series of interventions to improve vancomycin dose administration, and to repeat the audit process to assess these interventions.

Methods: Three prospective audits were conducted to assess the impact of vancomycin TDM on administration of vancomycin. After the first audit, a number of changes in the TDM process were undertaken. After review of the second audit, a senior pharmacist coordinated ward-based pharmacists in assisting staff to interpret levels, and TDM interpretative charts were designed for drug charts. Following the third audit, feedback to hospital management and a plan for ongoing education were undertaken.

Results: There was a significant reduction in the number of vancomycin doses held inappropriately in the third (10% (78/782) of prescribed doses) when compared to the first audit (16% (161/1007) of doses)(p<0.01). Of doses that were held inappropriately, there was a significant decrease in doses held for no apparent reason in audit three (16% (27/170) of prescribed doses) when compared to audit one (25% (69/282) of doses) (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Our interventions resulted in a 37.5% reduction in inappropriately held vancomycin doses over a one-year period. 10% of doses are still being held inappropriately. This study highlights the difficulties in identifying barriers to change and changing healthcare worker behaviour.

Key Words: audit, therapeutic drug monitoring, vancomycin







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.