HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jcp.2007.054833v1 61/4/426    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Omar, F. Articles by Pillay, T. S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Omar, F. Articles by Pillay, T. S Topic Collections Relevant Article

Reference change values: how useful are they?

¹ Division of Chemical Pathology, University of Cape Town, and National Health Laboratory Service, Chemical Pathology, C17, New Building, Groote Schuur Hospital, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa
² Division of Chemical Pathology, University of Cape Town, and National Health Laboratory Service, Chemical Pathology, ICH Building, Red Cross Children’s Hospital, Klipfontein Road, Rondebosch, 7700, Cape Town, South Africa
³ Division of Chemical Pathology, University of Cape Town and National Health Laboratory Service, Division of Chemical Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa

Correspondence to:
Dr Fierdoz Omar, Division of Chemical Pathology, University of Cape Town, and National Health Laboratory Service, Chemical Pathology, C17, New Building, Groote Schuur Hospital, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa; fierdoz.omar@uct.ac.za

Accepted 11 January 2008

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Clinicians use several approaches in the interpretation of laboratory results. These include comparison with predetermined cut-off values or reference values, or a comparison between two sequential results for a specific analyte.¹ Each has its own merits. The latter is the focus of this commentary.

A simple comparison between two sequential results is not as straightforward as it seems. It should be remembered that each result is associated with its own inherent random variation, meaning that each result obtained is, in fact, a dispersion rather than a singular value. This random variation comprises both variation associated with laboratory activity (pre-analytical and analytical variation) and inherent biological variation (intra-individual) (see box 1).

Box 1: Total variation CVT = (CVP2+ CVA2+ CVI2)1/2 CVP is considered negligible due to standardised collection protocols, therefore: CVT = (CVA2+ CVI2)1/2 The total variation consists of the sum of all associated variations, where CVP = pre-analytical variation, . . . [Full text of this article]

 

Relevant Article

What is a significant difference between sequential laboratory results?Calf muscle pain can indicate localised vasculitis

W S A Smellie
J. Clin. Pathol. 2008 61: 419-425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]