JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, I S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, I S
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2005;58:575
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists


EDITORIAL

Clinical biochemistry

Interpretive comments on clinical biochemistry reports

I S Young

Correspondence to:
Professor I S Young
Department of Medicine, Wellcome Research Laboratories, Mulhouse Building, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BJ, UK; I.Young@qub.ac.uk


The need for quality assurance

Keywords: interpretive comments; clinical biochemistry; quality assurance

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In the February issue of the journal, Sandle discussed current practice and future challenges in the management of external quality assurance in relation to clinical biochemistry, highlighting the need for an audit cycle of continuous improvement.1 One of the important areas touched upon was the quality assurance of interpretive comments on biochemistry reports; it was suggested that in the future individual participation in external quality assurance schemes of interpretive comments "may become a contractual rather than a professional obligation".

There is wide variation internationally and within the UK with regard to the extent to which individualised narrative interpretive comments are provided on biochemistry reports. Most biochemistry reports leave the laboratory without comment, or with only computer generated comments according to predetermined rules. However, the provision of individualised narrative comments on at least some biochemistry reports is part of routine practice in many laboratories. The objective is to aid . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.