JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kilpatrick, E S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kilpatrick, E S
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2004;57:344-345
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists


EDITORIAL

HbA1c measurement

HbA1c measurement

E S Kilpatrick

Correspondence to:
Dr E S Kilpatrick
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Hull Royal Infirmary, Anlaby Road, Hull HU3 2JZ, UK; eric_kilpatrick@hotmail.com


As methods improve, inherent limitations become more apparent

Keywords: International Federation of Clinical Chemistry; glycated haemoglobin

Abbreviations: DCCT, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial; IFCC, International Federation of Clinical Chemistry; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; UKPDS, United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

It is difficult to overestimate the contribution made by glycated haemoglobin measurement (usually in the form of HbA1c) to the management of patients with diabetes mellitus and the reliance now placed on the test by clinicians. Before its introduction as a routine test in the late 1970s and early 1980s, objectively assessing glycaemic control relied on measures such as 24 hour urine glucose excretions1 and daily blood glucose profiles.2 By comparison, measurement of HbA1c gave a much more reliable measure of glucose control over the prolonged period of the previous six to eight weeks.3 The clinical usefulness of the test was cemented by major trials, such as the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) in type 1 diabetes4 and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) in type 2 diabetes.5 Both showed that improved glycaemic control, as assessed by HbA1c, could lead to substantial reductions in . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Clin BiochemHome page
D. R Macdonald, A. M Hanson, M. R Holland, and B. M Singh
Clinical impact of variability in HbA1c as assessed by simultaneously measuring fructosamine and use of error grid analysis
Ann Clin Biochem, July 1, 2008; 45(4): 421 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
R. M. Cohen, T. J. LeCaire, C. J. Lindsell, E. P. Smith, and D. J. D'Alessio
Relationship of Prospective GHb to Glycated Serum Proteins in Incident Diabetic Retinopathy: Implications of the glycation gap for mechanism of risk prediction
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2008; 31(1): 151 - 153.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
L. Herranz, L. Saez-de-Ibarra, C. Grande, and L. F. Pallardo
Non-Glycemic-Dependent Reduction of Late Pregnancy A1C Levels in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2007; 30(6): 1579 - 1580.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. DiabetesHome page
R. J. Schrot, K. T. Patel, and P. Foulis
Evaluation of Inaccuracies in the Measurement of Glycemia in the Laboratory, by Glucose Meters, and Through Measurement of Hemoglobin A1c
Clin. Diabetes, April 1, 2007; 25(2): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
T. M Reynolds, W S. A Smellie, and P. J Twomey
Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) monitoring
BMJ, September 16, 2006; 333(7568): 586 - 588.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
W S A Smellie, J Forth, D Bareford, P Twomey, M J Galloway, E C M Logan, S R S Smart, T M Reynolds, and C Waine
Best practice in primary care pathology: review 3.
J. Clin. Pathol., August 1, 2006; 59(8): 781 - 789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.