JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silvestrini, R A
Right arrow Articles by Benson, E M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silvestrini, R A
Right arrow Articles by Benson, E M
J Clin Pathol 2001; 54:677-678
© 2001 Journal of Clinical Pathology


Viewpoint

Whither smooth muscle antibodies in the third millennium?

R A Silvestrini, E M Benson

Department of Immunopathology, ICPMR, Westmead Hospital, PO Box 60, Wentworthville NSW 2145, Australia

rogers@icpmr.wsahs.nsw.gov.au Lupoid hepatitis (now known as autoimmune hepatitis type I) was defined as an autoimmune disease by Mackay and colleagues in 1965.1 An immunological marker of the disease was identified by Johnson et al in 1965 in the form of an "antismooth muscle antibody".2,3 Over the following 30 years, smooth muscle antibody (SMA) has been used in the evaluation of patients with raised transaminases and has been given a defining role among diagnostic criteria for autoimmune hepatitis by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group.4 Testing of these criteria on defined patient cohorts showed the criteria to be robust in defining autoimmune hepatitis.5 Yet now, in the first year of the third millennium, SMA appears to have "fallen from grace". Hepatologists are dismissing the test as useless (numerous personal communications), whereas others assert in an influential publication that they "do not recommend its routine use for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis".6 As immunopathologists, . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
A Granito, L Muratori, P Muratori, G Pappas, M Guidi, F Cassani, U Volta, A Ferri, M Lenzi, and F B Bianchi
Antibodies to filamentous actin (F-actin) in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis.
J. Clin. Pathol., March 1, 2006; 59(3): 280 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
S J Katona, P C Cooper, M E Cramp, and E R Kaminski
Re: Whither smooth muscle antibodies in the third millennium?
J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2002; 55(7): 558 - 559.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.