JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 August 2008

J Clin Pathol. Published Online First: 21 May 2008. doi:10.1136/jcp.2008.057158
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jcp.2008.057158v1
61/8/928    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carder, P. J
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carder, P. J
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, N.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Breast Cancer

Histopathology

LARGE VOLUME "MAMMOTOME" BIOPSY MAY REDUCE THE NEED FOR DIAGNOSTIC SURGERY IN PAPILLARY LESIONS OF THE BREAST

Pauline J Carder 1*, Tahir Khan 1, Paul Burrows 1 and Nisha Sharma 1

1 Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: paulinecarder{at}doctors.org.uk.

Accepted 24 April 2008


*   Abstract

Background: There is currently debate as to whether all papillary lesions diagnosed on breast needle core biopsy require surgical excision. The recent development of large volume "mammotome" biopsy offers a means of non-operative removal. There is little published data regarding the success of this approach.

Aim: To review the pathological and radiological findings in cases of non-diagnostic "B3" and "B4" papillary lesions identified on conventional breast needle core biopsy with a view to assessing the usefulness of mammotome biopsy as a means of avoiding diagnostic surgery.

Methods: All breast core biopsies containing a "B3" or "B4" papillary lesion between 23/06/05 and 14/08/07 were identified by searching the pathology department computer records. Follow up histology was identified from pathology department computer records and radiological details were obtained from the local screening unit or the radiology department.

Results: Thirty-four papillary breast core biopsies were included in this study. Twenty-one were from screen-detected lesions and thirteen were from patients presenting symptomatically. Thirty-one were classified "B3" and three were "B4s". Four cases included an atypical ductal epithelial proliferation (all "B4"s and one "B3").Fourteen patients underwent open surgical biopsy, fifteen mammotome excision and five had no subsequent procedure. All fifteen cases who underwent mammotome biopsy did not show atypia on the core and thirteen (87%) proved benign. In two cases the mammotome biopsy was either atypical or malignant prompting surgery at this point. In both cases the mammotome biopsy changes derived from areas of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) arising in the context of multiple intraduct papillomas and both were distinctive mammographically in presenting with large areas of segmental calcification. Eleven of the fourteen cases undergoing surgical excision did not show atypia on the core and all proved benign. All three with atypia on the core proved malignant.

Conclusion: In selected cases, large volume ("mammotome") biopsy may improve sampling of papillary lesions such that malignancy may be excluded without recourse to diagnostic surgery. The presence of an atypical papillary proliferation on core or mammotome biopsy is a strong predictor of malignancy. This has important implications for both symptomatic and breast screening services.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.