JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

J Clin Pathol. Published Online First: 6 March 2008. doi:10.1136/jcp.2007.047720
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Gianni Bussolati
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bussolati, G.
Right arrow Articles by Leonardo, E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bussolati, G.
Right arrow Articles by Leonardo, E.

Molecular Pathology

Technical pitfalls potentially affecting diagnoses in immunohistochemistry

Gianni Bussolati 1* and Eugenio Leonardo 2

1 University of Turin, Italy
2 - A.S.O. S. Luigi - Orbassano, Italy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gianni.bussolati{at}unito.it.

Accepted 15 January 2008


*   Abstract

Result of the immunohistochemical reactions routinely used in diagnostic surgical pathology should be properly interpreted, since false results, related to technical and interpretative pitfalls may lead to incorrect diagnosis. We review of the main sources of such pitfalls, analytically described and related to different steps (fixation, tissue processing and embedding, decalcification, antigen retrieval) which may affect the accuracy of immunohistochemistry. In addition, presence of endogenous enzyme activity, improper binding of avidin to endogenous biotin, incorrect use of antibodies, chromogen and detection system, as well as incorrect interpretation may produce unreliable data. The high frequency and extension of such pitfalls make mandatory the use of internal and external controls and adoption of cross-validation programs. The present study, supported by an extensive review of the related literature is intended as a guideline leading to proper interpretation of immunohistochemical data, an essential component of the diagnostic process. Our experience on the antigen retrieval procedures for different antigens is also presented.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.