JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 4 August 2008. doi:10.1136/jcp.2008.059204
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2008;61:1029-1033
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jcp.2008.059204v1
jcp.2008.059204v2
61/9/1029    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Donnell, S
Right arrow Articles by O’Morain, C
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O’Donnell, S
Right arrow Articles by O’Morain, C

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Assessment of the clinical significance of intestinal spirochaetosis

S O’Donnell1, N Swan2, P Crotty2, D Sangster1, C O’Morain1

1 Department of Gastroenterology, AMNCH/Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
2 Department of Histopathology, AMNCH, Dublin, Ireland

Correspondence to:
Dr S O’Donnell, Department of Gastroenterology, AMNCH, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland; odonnes2{at}tcd.ie

Background: Spirochaetes are well known causative agents of diarrhoea in veterinary medicine. However, there is no agreement as to whether or not they have any clinical significance in humans.

Aims: To assess the symptoms associated with intestinal spirochaetosis, their response to treatment and the natural history of untreated cases.

Methods: A retrospective review of all cases of intestinal spirochaetosis identified within an eight year period in a single university teaching hospital was performed. A chart review and follow up telephone interview was performed to assess the indications for colonoscopy that led to the diagnosis, treatment received, and duration and nature of symptoms.

Results: 18 cases were identified. The indications for colonoscopy were diarrhoea in 50% and rectal bleeding in 16.7%; also investigation of constipation, anaemia and abdominal pain, and in two cases reassessment of chronic proctitis. Two subjects were treated with metronidazole and two were treated with aminosalicylates. 69% had complete resolution of symptoms at follow-up, 15% had persistent symptoms and 15% had intermittent symptoms. Of the two patients treated with metronidazole, one had resolution of symptoms and one has persistent abdominal pain.

Conclusion: Symptoms do not appear to parallel spirochaete persistence or eradication and therefore it seems appropriate to adopt a wait and see approach to treatment of patients in whom spirochaetes are identified, giving a trial of antimicrobial treatment only in those who have severe or persistent symptoms. Careful consideration of both host and pathogen should be undertaken.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.