Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 30 May 2008. doi:10.1136/jcp.2008.057067
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2008;61:939-944
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Impact of standardised reporting in adrenocortical carcinoma: a single centre clinicopathological review

A Advani1,2, S Vaikkakara1, M S Gill3, C S Arun1, S H Pearce1, S G Ball1, R A James1, T W J Lennard4, R D Bliss4, R Quinton1 and S J Johnson3

1 Department of Endocrinology, The Newcastle upon Tyne NHS University Hospital Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
2 Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, and University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3 Department of Cellular Pathology, The Newcastle upon Tyne NHS University Hospital Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
4 Department of Surgery, The Newcastle upon Tyne NHS University Hospital Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr Sarah J Johnson, Department of Cellular Pathology, The Newcastle upon Tyne NHS University Hospital Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK; sarah.johnson8{at}nuth.nhs.uk

Aims: Structured multicentre efforts are needed if the prognosis of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is to be improved. Data collection may be enhanced through standardised histopathological reporting using criteria such as the recently published Royal College of Pathologists’ (UK) minimum dataset (MDS). This study aimed to perform a clinicopathological review of the adult patients treated at the Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, in the 10 years preceding the MDS.

Methods: Case records were examined for all patients diagnosed with ACC between 1996 and 2006. Pathology was reviewed and compared with the Royal College of Pathologists’ MDS along with the original reports. A systematic evaluation of Ki-67 immunolabelling was also performed.

Results: Eleven patients with ACC were diagnosed and treated. Histopathological reporting according to the MDS identified more features of malignancy than in the original reports (8.5±1.2 versus 5.1±0.8, p<0.02). The median number of microscopic criteria of malignancy was 7 (range 5–10), with >=5 features occurring in all cases. The most commonly observed features of malignancy were diffuse architecture, <25% clear cells, confluent necrosis, abnormal mitoses and mitotic count >=6 per 50 high-power fields. Capsular invasion and >=8 MDS criteria of malignancy were associated with a worse outcome (each p<0.01). Median Ki-67 index was 19.0% (range 3.7–44.1%) and was not apparently related to survival.

Conclusions: Standardised criteria for histopathological reporting of ACC will improve the accuracy of data for cancer registration and may also assist in individual patient stratification. An elevated Ki-67 index is a feature of ACC, although it does not appear to predict individual patient survival.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs