Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 1 April 2008. doi:10.1136/jcp.2007.054866
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2008;61:818-824
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

BEST PRACTICE

HER2 testing in the UK: further update to recommendations

R A Walker1, J M S Bartlett2, M Dowsett3, I O Ellis4, A M Hanby5, B Jasani6, K Miller7 and S E Pinder8

1 Department of Cancer Studies and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester, RKCSB, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
2 Endocrine Cancer Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
3 Department of Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
4 Molecular Medical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
5 Pathology and Tumour Biology, Wellcome Trust, Leeds Institute for Molecular Medicine, St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK
6 Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
7 Department of Histopathology, University College Medical School, London, UK
8 Kings College London, Department of Academic Oncology, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence to:
R A Walker, Department of Cancer Studies and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester, RKCSB, Leicester Royal Infirmary, PO Box 65, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK; raw14{at}le.ac.uk

These guidelines update the previous UK HER2 testing guidelines and have been formulated to give advice on methodology, interpretation and quality assurance to ensure that HER2 testing results are accurate, reliable and timely with the expansion of testing to all patients with breast cancer at the time of primary diagnosis. The recommendations for testing are the use of immunohistochemistry but with analysis of equivocal cases by in situ hybridisation to clarify their HER2 status or the use of frontline fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) testing for those laboratories wishing to do so; the inclusion of a chromosome 17 probe is strongly recommended. Laboratories using chromogenic or silver in situ hybridisation should perform an initial validation against FISH. For immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridisation there must be participation in the appropriate National External Quality Assurance scheme.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Plebani, M., Lippi, G., Bartlett, J. M.S., Miller, K., Hicks, D. G., Kulkarni, S. (2009). HER2: Closing the Gap Between Laboratory Testing and Clinical Practice. Am J Clin Pathol 131: 897-898 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs