Journal of Clinical Pathology 2008;61:419-425
REVIEW
What is a significant difference between sequential laboratory results?Calf muscle pain can indicate localised vasculitis
Correspondence to:
Dr W Stuart A Smellie, Clinical Laboratory, General Hospital, Cockton Hill Road, Bishop Auckland, County Durham DL14 6AD, UK; stuart.smellie{at}cddft.nhs.uk
The uncertainty of a numerical laboratory result can be masked by the fact that the laboratory reports an absolute number, whereas users have limited knowledge of the confidence interval of the result. Interpretation of laboratory tests is in reality therefore an inexact science, a balance between clinical context and the likely relevance of a laboratory result.
This review considers the factors which contribute to result variability and examines the implications for interpreting differences between sequential laboratory results. It offers suggestions to deal with a problem which has not yet been much addressed in routine practice. The examples used are restricted to the discipline of clinical biochemistry, although the issues and principles apply to numerical (and indeed qualitative) results in other disciplines.
Laboratories could provide more guidance on the likelihood of a result being significant to assist users. There is a need for discussion about how this is best done, and compatible with electronic result delivery. Options for providing this information are considered.
Relevant Article
- Reference change values: how useful are they?
- Fierdoz Omar, George F van der Watt, and Tahir S Pillay
J. Clin. Pathol. 2008 61: 426-427.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
McQueen, M. J., Don-Wauchope, A. C.
(2008). Requesting and Interpreting Urine Albumin Measurements in the Primary Health Care Setting. Clin. Chem.
54: 1595-1597
[Full Text] -
Omar, F., van der Watt, G. F, Pillay, T. S
(2008). Reference change values: how useful are they?. J. Clin. Pathol.
61: 426-427
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
