JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 14 July 2007. doi:10.1136/jcp.2007.050757
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2008;61:343-346
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jcp.2007.050757v1
61/3/343    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tan, T Y
Right arrow Articles by Kwang, L L
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tan, T Y
Right arrow Articles by Kwang, L L
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Antibiotics

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Evaluation of disc susceptibility tests performed directly from positive blood cultures

T Y Tan, L S Y Ng, L L Kwang

Division of Laboratory Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore

Correspondence to:
Dr Thean Yen Tan, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei Street 3, Singapore 529889; thean_yen_tan{at}cgh.com.sg

Aims: To evaluate the accuracy of direct disc susceptibility testing performed from positive BACTEC blood culture vials, using a predetermined dilution protocol.

Methods: Direct susceptibility testing was performed from 432 positive blood culture vials, generating 3829 antibiotic-organism results. Results were compared with those obtained by standard disc susceptibility testing according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methods.

Results: When results were compared with the reference method, no very major errors were detected. One (0.03%) major error and 89 (2.3%) minor errors were found. Error rates by organism group ranged from 1.3% for Pseudomonas aeruginosa to 8.2% for β-haemolytic streptococci.

Conclusions: Direct susceptibility testing provided accurate susceptibility results for most organism–antibiotic combinations, with the exception of the β-haemolytic streptococci.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.