Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 3 August 2007. doi:10.1136/jcp.2007.049411
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2008;61:297-300
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

The correlation of regression in primary melanoma with sentinel lymph node status

C Kaur1, R J Thomas1, N Desai2, M A Green1, D Lovell3, B W E M Powell4 and M G Cook1,3

1 Department of Histopathology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
2 Department of Dermatology, St George’s Hospital, London, UK
3 Postgraduate Medical School, Guildford, UK
4 Department of Plastic Surgery, St George’s Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Professor M G Cook, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK; m.cook{at}nhs.net

Background: The significance of regression in primary melanoma has been disputed for many years. Some have suggested regression as a marker for poor prognosis while others have reported a negligible or even a favourable effect, on prognosis.

Aim: To understand the significance of regression in melanoma and provide further information on whether patients should be subjected to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) on the basis of regression.

Methods: 146 melanoma cases who had undergone SLNB were included in the study. The histological criteria for offering SLNB were melanoma >1 mm in thickness, Clark’s level IV or those with regression.

Results: A statistically significant greater proportion of individuals without regression showed sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity (p = 0.028) compared with those which do show regression. Metastatic disease correlated with growth phase of the primary lesion. All the node positive cases were in the vertical growth phase; none of the cases in radial growth phase and showing regression were associated with nodal metastasis (p = 0.029). 62 cases had melanomas with thickness <1 mm and were in radial growth phase, yet were offered SLNB because of regression. Of these, 44 showed features of regression and all were node negative. The remaining 16 cases of thin melanomas did not show regression; 2 of these had sentinel node metastasis.

Conclusion: Results suggest that regression is usually a favourable process, particularly in thin melanomas and that metastasis in "thin melanomas showing regression" is real but rare. Variant vertical growth phase, mitoses and other prognostically significant variables may be more important predictors of metastatic potential in thin melanomas.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Cook, M G, Di Palma, S (2008). Pathology of sentinel lymph nodes for melanoma. J. Clin. Pathol. 61: 897-902 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs