HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jcp.2007.047340v1 61/1/79    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Blind, C Articles by Petersen, I PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Blind, C Articles by Petersen, I Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Breast Cancer

Antigenicity testing by immunohistochemistry after tissue oxidation

¹ Institute of Pathology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin
² provitro GmbH, Charité Campus Mitte, 10117 Berlin

Correspondence to:
Iver Petersen, Institute of Pathology, Charité Campus Mitte, D-10098 Berlin; iver.Petersen{at}charite.de

Aims: Archived tissue blocks preserve the antigenicity of samples for a long time under normal storage conditions, whereas tissue sections may show a diminished immunoreactivity over time. Little is known about the processes responsible for antigenicity loss and how tissue sections should be conserved for extended storage. Oxidation and drying are presumed mechanisms of antigenicity loss. To prove this, degradation of immunoreactivity was provoked by chemical oxidation, photo-oxidation and artificial drying.

Methods: First, paraffin sections of an oestrogen receptor (ER) positive breast carcinoma were subjected for variable time periods to H₂O₂, ultraviolet A (UVA) irradiation and dry heat (56°C) prior to ER immunohistochemistry. Second, using heat and UVA irradiation several other antigens (ER, PR, HER-2neu, p53, p63, p16, PSA, CK5/6, CK7, CK20, SMA, Fli-1, c-kit, CD20 and EGFR) were tested, using internal control tissue microarray sections.

Results: While H₂O₂ had no effect on the ER-staining intensity, extended drying showed a detectable decrease in staining after 10 days, and UVA irradiation induced a decrease after 3 days. Entire antigenicity loss was not observed. Except for HER-2neu, PSA and Fli-1, all antigens showed some diminution in antigenicity, but no entire antigenicity loss, after heating and UVA irradiation.

Conclusions: This study confirms that photo-oxidation and drying have an influence on immunohistochemistry outcome, and protocols for testing the stability of specific antigens are provided.

Keywords: antigenicity loss in immunohistochemistry; tissue microarray; storage of tissue section slides