Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 5 April 2007. doi:10.1136/jcp.2007.046763
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2008;61:68-71
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Comparing subjective and digital image analysis HER2/neu expression scores with conventional and modified FISH scores in breast cancer

I Skaland1, I Øvestad1, E A M Janssen1, J Klos1, K H Kjellevold1, T Helliesen1 and J P A Baak1,2,3

1 Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
2 Department of Pathology, The Gade Institute, University of Bergen, Norway
3 Department of Pathology, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Professordr J P A Baak, Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Box 8100, 4068 Stavanger, Norway; baja{at}sus.no

Background: HER2/neu expression and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) amplification have therapeutic significance.

Aims: To compare subjective HER2/neu expression scores with digital image analysis (DIA) and conventional and modified FISH scores in breast cancer.

Methods: Sixty HercepTest-immunostained breast carcinomas, prospectively scored as consensus 2+ and 3+ (DAKO protocol) by two observers, were analysed with DIA, and conventional (Vysis) and modified FISH scoring protocols.

Results: With consensus scoring, 23 (38%) of the 60 cases were 2+ and 37 (62%) were 3+. Agreement with DIA scores was 100%. With conventional FISH scoring, 4 of the 3+ cases did not show amplification, but all of those negative cases had high HER2/neu copy numbers. With the modified FISH scoring protocol, all HercepTest immunohistochemical 3+ cases were amplified. Of the 2+ cases, 3 were amplified with the modified FISH protocol and 4 with the conventional FISH protocol.

Conclusions: Modified FISH scores were better correlated with HercepTest 3+ consensus and DIA scores than were conventional FISH scores. HER2/neu DIA scoring is a cost-effective supplementary tool in surgical pathology.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs