Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 8 December 2006. doi:10.1136/jcp.2006.043869
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2007;60:1017-1023
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

MYC amplification in breast cancer: a chromogenic in situ hybridisation study

S Maria Rodriguez-Pinilla1, Robin L Jones1, Maryou B K Lambros1, Edurne Arriola1, Kay Savage1, Michelle James1, Sarah E Pinder2 and Jorge S Reis-Filho1

1 The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
2 Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Jorge S Reis-Filho
The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK; Jorge.Reis-Filho{at}icr.ac.uk

Aims: To analyse the correlation between MYC amplification and various clinicopathological features and outcome in a cohort of 245 patients with invasive breast carcinoma treated with surgery followed by anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Given the high prevalence of MYC amplification in tumours of BRCA1 mutation carriers and the similarities between these and sporadic "basal-like" carcinomas, the prevalence of MYC amplification in "basal-like" breast carcinomas was investigated.

Methods: MYC gene copy number was assessed on tissue microarrays containing duplicate cores of 245 invasive breast carcinomas by means of chromogenic in situ hybridisation using SpotLight C-MYC amplification probe and chromosome 8 centromeric probe (CEP8). Signals were evaluated at 400x magnification; 30 morphologically unequivocal neoplastic cells in each core were counted for the presence of the gene and CEP8 probes.

Results: Amplification was defined as a MYC:CEP8 ratio >2. Signals for both MYC and CEP8 were assessable in 196/245 (80%) tumours. MYC amplification was found in 19/196 cases (9.7%) and was not associated with tumour size, histological grade, positivity for oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, epidermal growth factor, cytokeratins 14, 5/6 and 17, MIB1 or p53. Only 4% of basal-like carcinomas showed MYC amplification, compared to 8.75% and 10.7% of luminal and HER2 tumours respectively. On univariate analysis, MYC amplification displayed a significant association with shorter metastasis-free and overall survival and proved to be an independent prognostic factor on multivariate survival analysis.

Conclusion: MYC amplification is not associated with "basal-like" phenotype and proved to be an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer patients treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

Abbreviations: CEP8, chromosome 8 centromeric probe; CISH, chromogenic in situ hybridisation; Ck, cytokeratin; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ER, oestrogen receptor; FISH, fluorescent in situ hybridisation; PR, progesterone receptor

Keywords: oncogene; MYC; CISH; prognosis; basal-like breast cancer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs