Correspondence to:
Dr W S Waring
Scottish Poisons Information Bureau, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK; s.waring{at}ed.ac.uk
Background: Blood glucose concentrations are essential in defining diabetes mellitus. Recent guidelines advocate either of two discrete methods for sample collection and processing. One of these involves addition of glycolysis inhibitors, such as sodium fluoridepotassium oxalate (NaFKOx) to sample collection tubes, whereas the other requires immediate refrigeration and sample separation.
Aims: To examine whether the choice of the preanalytical process has any impact on subsequent glucose determinations.
Methods: 62 healthy men participated in the study during screening for diabetes. Paired venous blood samples were collected in a serum-gel tube and a tube containing NaFKOx (both Sarstedt, Leicester, UK). Serum was promptly separated from gel tube samples and refrigerated, whereas NaFKOx samples were not separated until immediately before analysis. Glucose concentrations were determined using an Olympus AU 2700 analyser incorporating an automated hexokinase method.
Results: Mean (95% CI) glucose concentration in serum-gel tube samples was 5.2 mmol/l (5.0 to 5.4 mmol/l), whereas the concentration in tubes containing NaFKOx was 4.9 mmol/l (4.8 to 5.1 mmol/l). A negative bias of 0.23 mmol/l (0.16 to 0.30 mmol/l) and relative negative bias of 4.7 % (3.2% to 6.3%) were observed for samples collected in NaFKOx tubes, consistent with the combined effects of glycolysis and dilution.
Conclusions: Bias associated with the use of NaFKOx tubes may have a significant impact on the prevalence of fasting hyperglycaemia, according to current diagnostic criteria. The small but significant difference between preanalytical processes should be considered when screening for the presence of diabetes mellitus.
Abbreviations: NaFKOx, sodium fluoridepotassium oxalate; WHO, World Health Organization
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online ¦ Website terms and conditions ¦ Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.