JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 17 August 2006. doi:10.1136/jcp.2006.040808
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2007;60:773-780
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jcp.2006.040808v1
60/7/773    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sweet, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sweet, J.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparison of annexin II, p63 and {alpha}-methylacyl-CoA racemase immunoreactivity in prostatic tissue: a tissue microarray study

Jocelyn Stewart1, Neil Fleshner2, Heather Cole1, Joan Sweet1

1 Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2 Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence to:
Dr Joan Sweet
E11-037 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4; joan.sweet{at}uhn.on.ca Background: Current ancillary markers for diagnosis in prostate biopsies include p63 and {alpha}-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR). Annexin II (ANXII), a calcium and phospholipid binding protein, is lost in prostate cancer.

Aims: To investigate ANXII expression in order to assess its utility as a novel diagnostic marker in comparison to p63 and AMACR.

Methods: Using immunohistochemistry on six tissue microarrays, ANXII, p63, and AMACR expression was analysed from 210 radical prostatectomy cases. Staining was evaluated in benign and atrophic glands, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), and prostatic adenocarcinoma. Separate scores were given for ANXII, AMACR and p63 expression.

Results: Diffuse cytoplasmic expression of ANXII correlated with p63 reactivity in basal cells. Benign glands were positive for ANXII in 286/292 cores (98%) and negative for AMACR in all 292 cores. HGPIN showed heterogeneous expression of AMACR and ANXII. A significantly larger proportion of HGPIN glands were correctly identified as ANXII negative than as positive for AMACR. ANXII loss in prostate cancer was found in 282/320 cores (88%) and correlated with positive AMACR expression (272/320 cores, 85%), which was not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant correlation between ANXII scores and the clinical parameters examined.

Conclusions: Immunohistochemical staining for ANXII is a consistent and reliable marker of prostatic neoplasia. The findings of this study suggest the potential utility of ANXII as a diagnostic aid in prostate cancer histopathology.


Abbreviations: AMACR, {alpha}-methylacyl-CoA racemase; ANXII, annexin II; HGPIN, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

Keywords: annexin A2; {alpha}-methylacyl-CoA racemase; diagnostic markers; prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia; prostatic neoplasms







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.