REVIEW

Best practice in primary care pathology: review 8

W S A Smellie¹, K K Hampton², R Bowlees³, S C Martin⁴, N Shaw³, J Hoffman⁵, J P Ng⁶, S M Mackenzie⁷ and C van Heyningen⁸

¹ Department of Chemical Pathology, Bishop Auckland General Hospital, Bishop Auckland, UK
² Department of Haematology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
³ Sowerby Centre for Health Informatics, All Saints Business Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
⁴ Department of Clinical Biochemistry, West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmonds, UK
⁵ Department of Histopathology, Bishop Auckland General Hospital, Bishop Auckland, UK
⁶ Department of Haematology, Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, UK
⁷ Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
⁸ Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr W S A Smellie
Department of Chemical Pathology, Bishop Auckland General Hospital, Cockton Hill Road, Bishop Auckland, County Durham DL14 6AD, UK; info{at}smellie.com

This eighth best practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (i) sodium abnormalities; (ii) faecal occult blood testing; (iii) warfarin management; and (iv) sputum cytology in diagnosis of bronchopulmonary malignancy. The review is presented in question–answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by Medline Embase searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence-based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.

Keywords: Best practice; evidence-based medicine; inter-disciplinary; primary care

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Shea, A. M., Hammill, B. G., Curtis, L. H., Szczech, L. A., Schulman, K. A. (2008). Medical Costs of Abnormal Serum Sodium Levels. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 19: 764-770 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Smellie, W S A, Vanderpump, M P J, Fraser, W D, Bowley, R, Shaw, N (2008). Best practice in primary care pathology: review 11. J. Clin. Pathol. 61: 410-418 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fraser, C. G (2008). Faecal occult blood tests - eliminate, enhance or update?. Ann Clin Biochem 45: 117-121 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Smellie, W S A, Shaw, N, Bowley, R, Stewart, M F, Kelly, A M, Twomey, P J, Chadwick, P R, Houghton, J B, Ng, J P, McCulloch, A J (2007). Best practice in primary care pathology: review 10. J. Clin. Pathol. 60: 1195-1204 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Smellie, W S A, Shaw, N, Bowlees, R, Taylor, A, Howell-Jones, R, McNulty, C A M (2007). Best practice in primary care pathology: review 9. J. Clin. Pathol. 60: 966-974 [Abstract] [Full Text]