Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 5 July 2006. doi:10.1136/jcp.2006.038828
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2007;60:410-414
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Utility of immunohistochemical analysis for cyclo-oxygenase 2 in the differential diagnosis of osteoblastoma and osteosarcoma

Ako Hosono1, Umio Yamaguchi2, Atsushi Makimoto1, Makoto Endo2, Atsuko Watanabe1, Tadakazu Shimoda3, Mitsunori Kaya4, Tadaki Matsumura5, Hiroshi Sonobe6, Tomomi Kusumi7, Takehiko Yamaguchi5 and Tadashi Hasegawa5

1 Division of Paediatric Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
2 Division of Orthopaedic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
3 Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Centre Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
5 Department of Surgical Pathology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
6 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, National Hospital Organization, Fukuyama Medical Centre, Fukuyama, Japan
7 Department of Pathology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr T Hasegawa
Department of Surgical Pathology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, South 1, West 16, Sapporo 060-8543, Japan;hasetada{at}sapmed.ac.jp

Aims: To study the immunoexpression of cyclo-oxygenase (COX) 2 in osteoblastomas (OBs) and osteosarcomas (OSs), and to assess the utility of immunohistochemical analysis for COX 2 in the differential diagnosis of the two tumour forms.

Methods: The immunohistochemical features of COX 2 were studied in 11 OBs and 30 OSs, including 26 high-grade OSs (16 osteoblastic, 7 chondroblastic, and 3 fibroblastic) and 4 low-grade OSs.

Results: Tumour cells from all 11 OBs unequivocally showed diffuse, intense and cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for COX 2. Strong cytoplasmic expression of COX 2 was observed in 5 of 26 (19%) high-grade OSs, all chondroblastic. In one osteoblastic-type OS, COX 2 was expressed in the chondroblastic component, but this tumour was considered to be COX 2 negative. No COX 2 expression was noted in atypical osteoblastic cells. Staining in the four low-grade OSs was negative.

Conclusion: The results of immunohistochemical analysis of COX 2 suggest that in addition to the routine histopathological evaluation, COX 2 is a valuable diagnostic marker in the distinction between OB and OS.

Abbreviations: COX, cyclo-oxygenase; OB, osteoblastomas; OS, osteosarcomas


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs