|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REVIEW |
Correspondence to:
Dr. B M Carruthers
4607 Blenheim St, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6L 3A3;bcarruth{at}telus.net
ABSTRACT
A perspective on the various definitions of myalgic encephalomyelitis and the process of discovering its aetiology is presented. The importance of clinical guidelines is emphasised to encourage clinicians to provide clear descriptions of their individual patients required for proper clinical activity; diagnosis, estimation of severity of effect, prognosis, treatment and rehabilitation. This individual knowledge is informed by general and (hopefully) publicly confirmed knowledge resulting from scientific research during the second-person interaction which lies at the core of the clinical encounter. Both types of knowledge are essential.
HOME
HELP
FEEDBACK
SUBSCRIPTIONS
ARCHIVE
SEARCH
TABLE OF CONTENTS
REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online ¦ Website terms and conditions ¦ Privacy policy
Journal of Clinical Pathology
Molecular Pathology
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.