Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 14 September 2007. doi:10.1136/jcp.2006.044586
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2007;60:1358-1364
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

VIRUSES AND LYMPHOMAS

Epstein–Barr virus-associated tumours: an update for the attention of the working pathologist

H-J Delecluse1, R Feederle1, B O’Sullivan2 and P Taniere2

1 German Research Cancer Centre, Department of Virus Associated Tumours, Heidelberg, Germany
2 Department of Cellular Pathology, UHB NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK

Correspondence to:
Professor Henri-Jacques Delecluse, German Research Cancer Centre, Department of Virus Associated Tumours, Im Neuenheimer Feld 242, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany; h.delecluse{at}dkfz.de

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is a herpesvirus associated with approximately 1% of tumours worldwide. EBV is the epitome of B lymphotropic viruses, but the spectrum of tumours it is associated with extends to T lymphocyte and NK cell malignancies, various types of carcinomas and smooth muscle tumours. Ubiquitous EBV infection in humans implies that most individuals carry EBV-infected cells. Therefore, mere detection of the virus in individuals with a tumour is not sufficient for establishing a causal relationship between both events, but instead requires unequivocal detection of viral nucleic acids or viral proteins in the tumour cells. Recent controversies about EBV infection in several carcinomas mainly resulted from such technical issues. The gold standard remains in situ EBER detection, but detection of EBNA1 would be an interesting alternative. EBV detection can be helpful for diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic purposes. The rate of EBV association with entities such as NK/T cell tumours of the nasal type is so high that absence of detection of the virus in such a lesion should cast doubt of the accuracy of the diagnosis. Similarly, diagnosis of EBV-associated follicular pseudo-tumour obviously requires detection of the virus. EBV-positive common gastric adenocarcinomas seem to have a better prognosis than their EBV-negative counterparts and identification of the virus in B cell lymphoproliferations in immunocompromised individuals will guide therapeutic options. In conclusion, EBV-associated tumours are common enough to be relevant for the pathologist in everyday practice, but there is a need to facilitate detection of the virus (eg EBNA1 antibody).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Carbone, A., Cesarman, E., Spina, M., Gloghini, A., Schulz, T. F. (2009). HIV-associated lymphomas and gamma-herpesviruses. Blood 113: 1213-1224 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gulley, M. L., Tang, W. (2008). Laboratory Assays for Epstein-Barr Virus-Related Disease. J. Mol. Diagn. 10: 279-292 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Carbone, A., Gloghini, A., Dotti, G. (2008). EBV-Associated Lymphoproliferative Disorders: Classification and Treatment. The Oncologist 13: 577-585 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs