Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 13 February 2007. doi:10.1136/jcp.2006.045518
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2007;60:1222-1225
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Histopathological assessment of lymph nodes in upper gastrointestinal cancer: does triple levelling detect significantly more metastases?

Stephen McGrath1, Sarah Cross2 and Susan Anne Pritchard3

1 Department of Histopathology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
2 Schering Health Care, Burgess Hill, UK
3 Department of Histopathology, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr Susan Anne Pritchard, Department of Histopathology, Clinical Sciences Building, Wythenshawe Hospital, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester M23 9LT, UK; susan.pritchard{at}smuht.nwest.nhs.uk

Background: For cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract it is standard to examine one section/level, from paraffin blocks containing lymph node tissue, for metastatic tumour.

Aims: To determine whether significantly more metastases can be detected by assessing two additional levels.

Methods: 101 archival upper gastrointestinal cancers were evaluated. All negative lymph nodes were examined at two additional levels separated by 100 µm and stained by H&E. The slides were examined for the presence of metastases.

Results: 1143 lymph nodes, that were originally clear of metastases, were examined at a further two levels (three levels in total); 23 additional metastases were identified in 17 patients. Eleven of these patients were already stage N1 before examination of the additional levels. However, six patients were originally N0, and were therefore upgraded to N1.

Conclusions: Examining lymph nodes at three levels did detect more metastatic deposits than examination of one section/level. In six patients this changed the N stage from N0 to N1. This would have significant prognostic and management implications.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Pritchard, S A (2008). Best practice in macroscopic examination of gastric resections. J. Clin. Pathol. 61: 172-178 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs