|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
1 Department of Histopathology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
2 Schering Health Care, Burgess Hill, UK
3 Department of Histopathology, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr Susan Anne Pritchard, Department of Histopathology, Clinical Sciences Building, Wythenshawe Hospital, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester M23 9LT, UK; susan.pritchard{at}smuht.nwest.nhs.uk
Background: For cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract it is standard to examine one section/level, from paraffin blocks containing lymph node tissue, for metastatic tumour.
Aims: To determine whether significantly more metastases can be detected by assessing two additional levels.
Methods: 101 archival upper gastrointestinal cancers were evaluated. All negative lymph nodes were examined at two additional levels separated by 100 µm and stained by H&E. The slides were examined for the presence of metastases.
Results: 1143 lymph nodes, that were originally clear of metastases, were examined at a further two levels (three levels in total); 23 additional metastases were identified in 17 patients. Eleven of these patients were already stage N1 before examination of the additional levels. However, six patients were originally N0, and were therefore upgraded to N1.
Conclusions: Examining lymph nodes at three levels did detect more metastatic deposits than examination of one section/level. In six patients this changed the N stage from N0 to N1. This would have significant prognostic and management implications.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S A Pritchard Best practice in macroscopic examination of gastric resections J. Clin. Pathol., February 1, 2008; 61(2): 172 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
| Journal of Clinical Pathology | Molecular Pathology |