Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 26 January 2007. doi:10.1136/jcp.2006.043950
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2007;60:1144-1147
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Gross synovial fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of joint effusion

S Abdullah1, S A Young-Min1, S J Hudson2, C A Kelly1, C R Heycock1 and J D Hamilton1

1 Department of Rheumatology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK
2 Department of Microbiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Gateshead, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr Shazia Abdullah, Musculoskeletal Department, The Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK; shaziaabdullah{at}doctors.org.uk

Aims: To develop an objective and easy to complete standardised questionnaire for documentation of synovial fluid (SF) gross appearance and use it in the assessment of patients presenting to the rheumatology service with a joint effusion.

Methods: A standardised questionnaire to record the gross appearance of SF was developed. Interobserver error in recorded observations and direct gross analysis of synovial fluid between four observers was calculated in a pilot study. In a prospective study over 8 months, SF gross analysis and cell count were documented in all patients presenting with a joint effusion. Fusch Rosenthal manual counting chamber was used for calculating SF cell counts.

Results: There was good interobserver agreement on direct gross analysis and between questionnaire assessors (mean {kappa} 0.889). 80 SF samples were collected. Gross analysis was performed in all samples and cell count in 72. Of the specimens thought to be inflammatory on gross analysis, 31% were found to be non-inflammatory based on cell count; however, 12 of these patients had an established inflammatory arthritis. Gross analysis had a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 58% when used to determine whether SF is inflammatory or non-inflammatory. The positive and negative predictive values were 0.69 and 0.91 respectively.

Conclusions: SF cell count did not add any information when SF gross analysis suggested a non-inflammatory process. Gross analysis was better than cell count to determine a potentially septic joint fluid. Further work needs to be done on the value of SF cell counts if gross analysis suggests the fluid to be inflammatory.

Abbreviations: ACR, American College of Rheumatology; BSR, British Society for Rheumatology; DMARD, disease modifying antirheumatic drug; PLM, polarised light microscopy; SF, synovial fluid

Keywords: arthritis; cell count; gross analysis; joint effusion; synovial fluid


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs