Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 13 February 2007. doi:10.1136/jcp.2006.044784
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2007;60:1098-1101
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Periacinar retraction clefting in proliferative prostatic atrophy and prostatic adenocarcinoma

Monika Ulamec1, Davor Tomas1, Christian Ensinger2, Hrvoje Cupic1, Mladen Belicza1, Gregor Mikuz2 and Bozo Kruslin1

1 Ljudevit Jurak Department of Pathology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
2 Institute of Pathology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

Correspondence to:
Professor Bozo Kruslin, Ljudevit Jurak Department of Pathology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital, Vinogradska cesta 29, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia; bkruslin{at}kbsm.hr

Aims: To evaluate the presence and extent of periacinar retraction clefting in proliferative prostatic atrophy and carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Methods: Atrophic foci and neoplastic glands were analysed in specimens from 50 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Analysed atrophic glands were classified in two main groups, proliferative atrophy (PA) and proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA); each group was subclassified into simple atrophy (SA) and postatrophic hyperplasia (PAH). According to the presence and extent of periacinar retraction clefting, atrophic and neoplastic glands were classified as: group 1, glands without clefts or with clefts affecting <=50% of gland circumference; group 2, glands with clefts that affected >50% of the circumference in <50% of examined glands; and group 3, glands with clefts that affected >50% of the circumference in >=50% of examined glands.

Results: Forty-four (88.0%) atrophic foci were without periacinar clefts or clefts were present in less than half of the gland circumference (group 1). In 6 (12.0%), atrophic foci clefts affected >50% of gland circumference (groups 2 and 3). Forty-five (90.0%) carcinomas were with clefts which affected more than 50% of gland circumference (groups 2 and 3); and in five carcinomas only, clefts were not found or affected <50% of gland circumference (group 1).

Conclusion: Results indicate that periacinar retraction clefting represents a reliable criterion in differential diagnosis between proliferative atrophy and carcinoma.

Abbreviations: PA, proliferative atrophy; PAH, postatrophic hyperplasia; PIA, proliferative inflammatory atrophy; SA, simple atrophy

Keywords: prostatic adenocarcinoma; prostatic atrophy; retraction clefting


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs