Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2006;59:903-911; doi:10.1136/jcp.2004.020610
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

MY APPROACH

Optimal processing of bone marrow trephine biopsy: the Hammersmith Protocol

K N Naresh, I Lampert, R Hasserjian, D Lykidis, K Elderfield, D Horncastle, N Smith, W Murray-Brown and G W Stamp

Department of Histopathology, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
K N Naresh
Department of Histopathology, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK; k.naresh{at}imperial.co.uk

ABSTRACT

Specimens of bone marrow trephine biopsy (BMT) are transported and fixed in acetic acid–zinc–formalin fixative, decalcified in 10% formic acid–5% formaldehyde and processed with other specimens to paraffin-wax embedding. Sections, 1-µm-thick, are cut by experienced histotechnologists and used for haematoxylin and eosin, Giemsa, reticulin silver and other histological stains. Further, all immunohistochemical procedures used in the laboratory, including double immunostaining, can be used on these sections with no or minimal modifications. About 10 000 BMT specimens have been analysed using this procedure since 1997 and diseases involving the bone marrow have been classified successfully. More recently, standardised polymerase chain reaction-based analysis and mRNA in situ hybridisation studies have been conducted. Excellent morphology with good antigen, DNA and RNA preservation is offered by the Hammersmith Protocol.

Abbreviations: AZF, acetic acid–zinc–formalin; BMT, bone marrow biopsy using trephine; EBV, Epstein–Barr virus; EDTA, ethylene diamine tetra acetate; H&E, haematoxylin and eosin; ISH, in situ hybridisation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Torlakovic, E E, Naresh, K, Kremer, M, van der Walt, J, Hyjek, E, Porwit, A (2009). Call for a European programme in external quality assurance for bone marrow immunohistochemistry; report of a European Bone Marrow Working Group pilot study. J. Clin. Pathol. 62: 547-551 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Spanoudakis, E., Hu, M., Naresh, K., Terpos, E., Melo, V., Reid, A., Kotsianidis, I., Abdalla, S., Rahemtulla, A., Karadimitris, A. (2009). Regulation of multiple myeloma survival and progression by CD1d. Blood 113: 2498-2507 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Joshi, R, Horncastle, D, Elderfield, K, Lampert, I, Rahemtulla, A, Naresh, K N (2008). Bone marrow trephine combined with immunohistochemistry is superior to bone marrow aspirate in follow-up of myeloma patients. J. Clin. Pathol. 61: 213-216 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rush, L. (2006). . Vet Pathol 43: 1042-1042 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Immunocytochemistry and In-Situ Hybridisation on bone marrow trephine biopsy
Lynne Doverty
JCP Online, 14 Feb 2007 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs