Journal of Clinical Pathology 2006;59:867-869
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Adjusting copper concentrations for caeruloplasmin levels in routine clinical practice
1 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, UK
2 Department of Chemical Pathology, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
3 The Medical Toxicology Unit Laboratory, Guys and St Thomas Hospital Trust, London, UK
4 Department of Chemical Pathology, Queens Hospital, Burton on Trent, UK
5 Department of Chemical Pathology, St Thomas Hospital, London
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
P J Twomey
Ipswich Hospital, Heath Road, Ipswich IP4 5PD, UK; patrick.twomey{at}ipswichhospital.nhs.uk
Background: An investigation on copper metabolism usually includes the measurement of serum levels of copper and caeruloplasmin. Using these levels, some laboratories derive levels of non-caeruloplasmin-bound copper (NCC); however, a considerable number of patients may show negative values, which is not physiologically possible.
Aim: To derive an equation for adjusted copper in a manner similar to that widely accepted for adjusted calcium.
Methods: A linear regression equation for the relationship between caeruloplasmin and copper was used: [copper] (µmol/l) = 0.052x[caeruloplasmin] (mg/l). An equation for copper adjusted for caeruloplasmin was derived using this equation and the reference interval of 1025 µmol/l for copper.
Results: The derived equation was [adjusted copper] (µmol/l) = [total copper] (µmol/l)+0.052x[caeruloplasmin] (mg/l)+17.5 (µmol/l). The adjusted copper concentrations on the 2.5th and 97.5th centiles were 12.7 and 21.5 µmol/l, respectively, with the population having a gaussian distribution. The relationship between NCC and the adjusted copper concentrations is linear and independent of caeruloplasmin concentration.
Conclusion: Calculation of copper adjusted for caeruloplasmin uses the same variables as those for NCC. Accordingly, the problems that are caused by the lack of specificity of caeruloplasmin immunoassays are the same as those identified for NCC. This calculation, however, overcomes the negative values that are found in a considerable minority of patients with NCC, as well as age and sex differences in the caeruloplasmin reference interval. As the concept is already familiar to non-laboratory healthcare professionals in the form of calcium adjusted for albumin, this method is potentially less confusing than that for NCC.
Abbreviations: NCC, non-caeruloplasmin-bound copper
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Twomey, P. J, Viljoen, A., House, I. M, Reynolds, T. M, Wierzbicki, A. S
(2007). Copper:caeruloplasmin ratio. J. Clin. Pathol.
60: 441-442
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
