|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
Correspondence to:
Dr D M Parham
Department of Pathology, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Castle Lane East, Bournemouth, Dorset BH7 7DW, UK; dmprbh{at}dmparham.plus.com
Background: External quality assessment schemes (EQAS) in pathology have been established in the United Kingdom for several years with the aim of raising standards.
Objective: To determine the experiences and perceptions of pathologists undertaking EQAS.
Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to histo/cytopathologists in the south and west of England.
Results: A large proportion of pathologists responding felt that the EQAS was educational, and 69% said participation had encouraged them to undertake additional educational activities. Some reservations were expressed about marking schemes. Asked if EQAS using digital images (CD-ROM or web based) rather that glass slides were valid alternatives two thirds responded no, despite 75% claiming to have appropriate IT skills.
Conclusions: EQAS play a valuable role in helping to maintain standards in histopathology and cytopathology. Some reservations were expressed about the marking schemes and further work is needed to establish a robust marking method. Significant barriers need to be overcome if digital EQAS are to be successfully implemented.
Abbreviations: EQAS, external quality assessment scheme; NHSBSP, NHS breast screening programme
Keywords: external quality assurance; EQAS; performance assessment; histopathology
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
| Journal of Clinical Pathology | Molecular Pathology |