JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 8 March 2006. doi:10.1136/jcp.2005.032912
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2006;59:530-532
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jcp.2005.032912v1
59/5/530    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parham, D M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parham, D M

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

External quality assessment slide schemes: pathologists’ experiences and perceptions

D M Parham

Correspondence to:
Dr D M Parham
Department of Pathology, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Castle Lane East, Bournemouth, Dorset BH7 7DW, UK; dmprbh{at}dmparham.plus.com Background: External quality assessment schemes (EQAS) in pathology have been established in the United Kingdom for several years with the aim of raising standards.

Objective: To determine the experiences and perceptions of pathologists undertaking EQAS.

Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to histo/cytopathologists in the south and west of England.

Results: A large proportion of pathologists responding felt that the EQAS was educational, and 69% said participation had encouraged them to undertake additional educational activities. Some reservations were expressed about marking schemes. Asked if EQAS using digital images (CD-ROM or web based) rather that glass slides were valid alternatives two thirds responded no, despite 75% claiming to have appropriate IT skills.

Conclusions: EQAS play a valuable role in helping to maintain standards in histopathology and cytopathology. Some reservations were expressed about the marking schemes and further work is needed to establish a robust marking method. Significant barriers need to be overcome if digital EQAS are to be successfully implemented.


Abbreviations: EQAS, external quality assessment scheme; NHSBSP, NHS breast screening programme

Keywords: external quality assurance; EQAS; performance assessment; histopathology







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.