HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fenwick, F Articles by Toms, G L Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fenwick, F Articles by Toms, G L

Immunohistochemical assessment of hepatitis C virus antigen in cholestatic hepatitis after liver transplantation

¹ The Schools of Clinical Medical Sciences, The Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
² Clinical Laboratory Sciences, The Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne

Correspondence to:
Dr G L Toms
The School of Clinical Medical Sciences, The Medical School, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK; Geoffrey.Toms{at}ncl.ac.uk Background: Patients with common variable immunodeficiency may exhibit rapidly progressive hepatitis when infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), leading to cirrhosis and liver failure. Liver transplantation in these patients may result in a cholestatic form of HCV reinfection with exceptionally high virus loads.

Aims: To report an immunohistochemical investigation of the pretransplant and post-transplant liver of one such patient.

Methods/Results: On immunohistochemical staining of frozen sections with anti-HCV core monoclonal antibody or fluorescein labelled human polyclonal anti-HCV IgG, no HCV antigens were demonstrated in the native cirrhotic liver removed at transplant, despite a viral load of 10^6.4 genomes/g. The transplanted liver, collected six weeks post-transplant, exhibited cholestatic recurrent hepatitis, had an HCV virus load of 10¹⁰ genomes/g of liver, and revealed HCV antigen in the cytoplasm of most hepatocytes, with a pronounced periportal distribution. No virus antigen was demonstrable in other cell types. The core antigen was also detected in paraffin wax embedded, formaldehyde fixed tissue of this liver after high temperature antigen retrieval, but not in the native cirrhotic liver or a selection of HCV positive livers collected pretransplant from immunocompetent patients. Attempts to delineate the distribution of E1, NS3, and NS4 antigens were unsuccessful because monoclonal antibodies to these antigens produced "false positive" staining of foci of hepatocytes in the post-transplant livers of HCV seronegative patients with cholestasis.

Conclusion: This case provided an opportunity to study the natural development of HCV during acute infection in the absence of an immune response, and may help to elucidate the pathogenesis of HCV recurrence in liver allografts.

Abbreviations: CVID, common variable immunodeficiency; HCV, hepatitis C virus; RT-PCR, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

Keywords: common variable immunodeficiency; monoclonal antibody